The 1.2GHz Celeron in my old laptop runs Windows 7 quite happily with 2GB of memory. It even worked with the original 512MB of memory although it was sluggish. Surprisingly, the bottleneck is the hard drive. I would install an SSD but the battery's borked (and obsolete) and the screen's a bit ropy. Still, a modern laptop with a less power-hungry processor would be nice.
The celeron had a bad reputation of being under powered and would struggle with basic stuff. Even the Atom was better.
I can't wait to see what the new Zen architecture from AMD will be like, from what I have read, it looks like it will be good and hopefully will knock Intel down a bit.
It is about time AMD sorted things out, the FX chips while cheap and still pretty good is based on 5 year old technology, the chipsets of their boards have not been changed for years, I can still buy the board I got 4 years ago, ok it is version 2, but the only difference is that it have USB 3 internal connections.
Granted some boards have got extras on, but that is because the manufactures have used extra chips to do that.
AMD APU is pretty good, I was chatting to someone who have the top end one and was running battlefield 4 on it with almost the full quality at a good frame rate, which is good as Battlefield 4 is pretty heavy on video cards. So for a APU to run it is good, something that Intel chips can't do.
So hopefully AMD will pull something out of the bag this year.
I won't buy a Intel based machine, but i was tempted by a Apple Mac before i updated this one.
Laptops I have very little interest in to be honest, my old Asus does what I want,, which is not much as I have not used it for months, in fact I am not sure where it is, I think it is in the cupboard under the stairs. i have never been fond of laptops, screens are too small, keyboards are normally naf and unless you pay a fortune for them they are low powered.
Adrian
Desktop machine now powered by windows 8.1 pro 64bit, no dreaded metro, laptop by Linux
Plusnet FTTC