You cannot have two roles, moderator or contributor. Make up your mind what you want to be, a moderator or have an impartial input to threads as a non moderator.

You obviously do not visit free chat often.

In reply to a post by billford:

You cannot have two roles, moderator or contributor

Oh yes I can... you should be able to tell the mode in which I'm posting without any difficulty.

What a cop out for one of our moderators. Answer the points raised and stand up for your actions (or lack of).

Face up to your moderator responsibilities. Answer the questions posed. You are a referee not a player.

Edited by monaltrie (Tue 24-Feb-09 19:15:57)

In reply to a post by Jack_Hackett:

You cannot have two roles, moderator or contributor. Make up your mind what you want to be, a moderator or have an impartial input to threads as a non moderator.

You obviously do not visit free chat often.

Probably not. But my comments are still valid.

In reply to a post by monaltrie:

In reply to a post by Jack_Hackett:

You cannot have two roles, moderator or contributor. Make up your mind what you want to be, a moderator or have an impartial input to threads as a non moderator.

You obviously do not visit free chat often.

Probably not. But my comments are still valid.

In my view Bill has as much right to give his opinion as anyone else here, I didn't realise when becoming a moderator you give up the right to post in the forums.

.

Do you agree with the poor and gutter responses by wingo1? Nobody has problems with people disagreeing with you but surely the manner in which they respond is a different matter.

A moderator is in position to monitor posts and 'moderate' (that is their job) contributions. If they participate in posts their moderating power loses strength.

They referee and not play.

Trolling again???.

In reply to a post by monaltrie:

Do you agree with the poor and gutter responses by wingo1? Nobody has problems with people disagreeing with you but surely the manner in which they respond is a different matter.

My views on his post are irrelevant I was only commenting on Bills rights to be a moderator and participate in the discussion at the same time.

A moderator is in position to monitor posts and 'moderate' (that is their job) contributions. If they participate in posts their moderating power loses strength.

They referee and not play.

I do not see how his "moderating power" loses strength, if he was abusing his "powers" by locking or deleting posts I would agree but I honestly don't think that's his style.

In reply to a post by wingco1:

Trolling again???.

As I said in a earlier post I've always been amazed at the number of non IDNet customers who congregate here, I have often wondered why this is.

Monaltrie is a large troll and unfortunately he has been evicted from beneath his bridge so is once again on the loose.

In reply to a post by cavillas:

Monaltrie is a large troll and unfortunately he has been evicted from beneath his bridge so is once again on the loose.

I seem to remember he got a weeks ban for trolling in this very forum.