Technical Discussion
  >> Apple Issues


Register (or login) on our website and you will not see this ad.


Pages in this thread: 1 | 2 | 3 | [4] | 5 | 6 | 7 | (show all)   Print Thread
Standard User micksharpe
(eat-sleep-adslguide) Mon 05-Nov-12 16:39:21
Print Post

Re: Usability or looks?


[re: billford] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by billford:
I'll be happy if someone could show me the error of my ways crazy
We'd all be happy to do that. Shall we form a queue? tongue

'Sir, please,' she said ... 'Will you not share your wisdom with us?'
'I have no wisdom,' he told her.
'Your experiences, then?'
'They have been trivial, uninteresting, and full of error.'
Ian M. Banks - Feersum Endjinn
.
It Ought to be Easy | Greasemonkey scripts
Moderator billford
(moderator) Mon 05-Nov-12 16:45:53
Print Post

Re: Usability or looks?


[re: micksharpe] [link to this post]
 
No need for a queue, you're all free to discuss the matter at any time (though not here!).

Just don't expect me to take the slightest bit of notice tongue

Bill
[email protected] __________________Planes and Boats and ... __________________BQM
The author of the above post is a thinkbroadband moderator but it does not constitute an official statement on behalf of thinkbroadband.
Standard User deleted
(deleted) Mon 05-Nov-12 16:46:59
Print Post

Re: Usability or looks?


[re: billford] [link to this post]
 
That was the subtext, Bill.


Register (or login) on our website and you will not see this ad.

Moderator billford
(moderator) Mon 05-Nov-12 16:55:13
Print Post

Re: Usability or looks?


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
Ah, OK... it fits with Apple trying to force everything through the AppStore frown

Bill
[email protected] __________________Planes and Boats and ... __________________BQM
The author of the above post is a thinkbroadband moderator but it does not constitute an official statement on behalf of thinkbroadband.
Standard User deleted
(deleted) Mon 05-Nov-12 17:03:54
Print Post

Re: Usability or looks?


[re: billford] [link to this post]
 
Yes. I find this locking down of software rather worrying. Currently you can install "unapproved" applications in Mountain Lion if you really insist, but give it a few more iterations of the OS and I can see it ending up like iOS.

It will be interesting to see if Microsoft follow the same path with their Applications Store. Still, there's always Linux.
Standard User NaNook
(freechataholic) Mon 05-Nov-12 17:09:20
Print Post

Re: Usability or looks?


[re: billford] [link to this post]
 
You are correct. I haven't used an optical drive for years so won't be missed by me.
Moderator billford
(moderator) Mon 05-Nov-12 17:11:45
Print Post

Re: Usability or looks?


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by AEP:
give it a few more iterations of the OS and I can see it ending up like iOS.
And a few more after that, everything will be in the Cloud and we'll effectively be running dumb terminals...

It could happen crazy

Bill
[email protected] __________________Planes and Boats and ... __________________BQM
The author of the above post is a thinkbroadband moderator but it does not constitute an official statement on behalf of thinkbroadband.
Standard User ian_c
(eat-sleep-adslguide) Mon 05-Nov-12 18:23:49
Print Post

Re: Usability or looks?


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
You mean with a single check of a checkbox? The is not "insisting" about and, having seen the scrapes many non-techies get into, the idea that the default security is 'high' is something only a retard would object to.

Standard User deleted
(deleted) Mon 05-Nov-12 18:29:11
Print Post

Re: Usability or looks?


[re: ian_c] [link to this post]
 
the idea that the default security is 'high' is something only a retard would object to.
Try to avoid the personal insults, Ian, or at least confine them to FC. It's really not necessary.
Standard User ian_c
(eat-sleep-adslguide) Mon 05-Nov-12 18:53:36
Print Post

Re: Usability or looks?


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
It wasn't a personal insult. It was an observation about the metal capacity of anyone who thinks low levels of security are a good thing.

Pages in this thread: 1 | 2 | 3 | [4] | 5 | 6 | 7 | (show all)   Print Thread

Jump to