Technical Discussion
  >> Apple Issues


Register (or login) on our website and you will not see this ad.


Pages in this thread: 1 | 2 | [3] | (show all)   Print Thread
Standard User jchamier
(eat-sleep-adslguide) Fri 15-Nov-24 19:46:58
Print Post

Re: When USB 4 (throughput) isn't quite claimed...in Mac-lan


[re: Pheasant] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by Pheasant:
They have claimed USB 4 (up to 40 Gbps) with every Apple Silicon generation that I'm aware of.

M series processors, not the A series. The M series are USB 4 / Thunderbolt.

The A series with lightning are only USB 2, but the A series with Pro (15 Pro/Pro Max etc) with USB-C ports are USB 3 (10 Gbps), viz:
https://support.apple.com/en-us/111829

10Gbps seems to be USB 3.2 Gen 2 (aka Gen 2x1) in the insane naming of the USB-IF committee. (Formerly known as 3.1 Gen 2… )

USB 4 has similar stupid naming, until I read Wikipedia’s article, I didn’t realise USB 4 was based on Thunderbolt 3 design/signalling.

24 years of broadband connectivity since 1999 trial - Live BQM
Standard User Pheasant
(eat-sleep-adslguide) Fri 15-Nov-24 20:16:54
Print Post

Re: When USB 4 (throughput) isn't quite claimed...in Mac-lan


[re: jchamier] [link to this post]
 
Indeed squire. Not referring to the telephonic instruments.

Apple Silicon being the moniker of M-series desktop and laptop beasts since they parted ways with Intel. iPads and iPhones as you’re all too well aware have always been “Apple Silicon” since inception.

USB naming, etc just leaves me confused ๐Ÿ˜ต‍๐Ÿ’ซ
Standard User jchamier
(eat-sleep-adslguide) Fri 15-Nov-24 21:29:08
Print Post

Re: When USB 4 (throughput) isn't quite claimed...in Mac-lan


[re: Pheasant] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by Pheasant:
Indeed squire. Not referring to the telephonic instruments.

Apple Silicon being the moniker of M-series desktop and laptop beasts since they parted ways with Intel. iPads and iPhones as you’re all too well aware have always been “Apple Silicon” since inception.

They use the "Apple Silicon" any time Johnny Sriji is on screen for all the products smile

USB naming, etc just leaves me confused ๐Ÿ˜ต‍๐Ÿ’ซ
Someone needs to beat the USB-IF around the head with a wet kipper, skipper.

24 years of broadband connectivity since 1999 trial - Live BQM


Register (or login) on our website and you will not see this ad.

Standard User Pheasant
(eat-sleep-adslguide) Fri 15-Nov-24 22:35:21
Print Post

Re: When USB 4 (throughput) isn't quite claimed...in Mac-lan


[re: jchamier] [link to this post]
 
I guess to be a someone in Apple you need to be a Johny or a Jony ๐Ÿ˜…
Standard User jchamier
(eat-sleep-adslguide) Sat 16-Nov-24 11:00:46
Print Post

Re: When USB 4 (throughput) isn't quite claimed...in Mac-lan


[re: Pheasant] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by Pheasant:
I guess to be a someone in Apple you need to be a Johny or a Jony ๐Ÿ˜…

LOL.. and I obviously can't spell.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johny_Srouji

24 years of broadband connectivity since 1999 trial - Live BQM
Standard User Pheasant
(eat-sleep-adslguide) Sat 16-Nov-24 11:11:30
Print Post

Re: When USB 4 (throughput) isn't quite claimed...in Mac-lan


[re: jchamier] [link to this post]
 
No fear, I’m not the grammar and spelling police๐Ÿ‘ฎ…today anyway ๐Ÿ˜‰๐Ÿ˜‚

Edit: my OP is full of complete howlers with FireWire splattered in place of Thunderbolt. Sadly I didn’t even clock it when I was writing it. How bad is that!!

Edited by Pheasant (Sat 16-Nov-24 11:14:41)

Standard User Pheasant
(eat-sleep-adslguide) Sat 16-Nov-24 13:35:46
Print Post

Re: When USB 4 (throughput) isn't quite claimed...in Mac-lan


[re: TinyMongomery] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by TinyMongomery:
Ah, then they are non-compliant iwith the USB specifications.

...yes as it stands, from what I've (very limited) tested. They're certainly not compliant with USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 device(s) - or at least don't pass the full line rate, just 10 Gbps.

However if the device says its USB 4 then they appear to be compliant (pass full rate) @ 40 Gbps.

I'm not going to waste time asking Apple 'why' this is. Doubtless they will just point me to the spec. page of the earlier machines which says USB 4 (up to 40 Gb/s) and USB 3.1 Gen 2 (up to 10 Gb/s).. and the latter takes precedence in Apple-universe.
Pages in this thread: 1 | 2 | [3] | (show all)   Print Thread

Jump to