I would switch if EE's 3G coverage matched threes.

The thing is EE needs to get a grip on reality price wise.

In reply to a post by janitor:

The thing is EE needs to get a grip on reality price wise.

Still cheaper than O2 and Voda for 4G. Its only three that is cheap for 4G, and why there is one mast in my town active.

http://shop.ee.co.uk/mobile-tariffs/sim-only-plans

In reply to a post by therioman:

In reply to a post by Yves:

3's 3G service in Central London is always congested during normal office hours.

That's pretty much the case on all networks I find in Central London - it's certainly unlikely you'll see the major headline speeds (and even EE's speed is rapidly falling as the capacity is used up - nobody seriously believes those headline figures are real world long term performance figures).

IME you're lucky in some parts of London to get a call or text through half the time, let alone data.

Definitely true. I can't make calls or texts in Canary Wharf for example. It's a bit of a joke really.

Not sure why your having issues in canary wharf, my friend on three lives there and it works fine.

There is, but the sheer number of users in one place is the problem...

In reply to a post by 5km:

The BIG problem Three has is they lack the frequency.

Aren't they due to get more spectrum shortly?

I'd sooner have a bit slower headline speed and better general speeds (as Three offer) with unlimited use (as I have now) than EE's poor customer service, great headline, incredibly variable real world speeds any day.

Highest amount of data you can get on EE is 4Gb (sim only). Could easily use that in a day.