The EU Commission blocked the acquisition of O2 by Hutchison under the EU Merger Regulation. Thus leaving the UK with four networks rather than the proposed three.
Interestingly both UK CMA and EU Commission said about 1.5 years later that the ruling was “probably incorrect”. In Germany they’ve dropped from 4 to 3 national networks without issue. In Ireland O2 sold out to Three and the O2 IE has gone.
On would think that four networks must cost more to run that just three. At the moment the four operators save money by not providing good coverage particularly in rural areas.
Yet they’ve all committed to the Government for the Shared Rural Network programme, so its not the case. This isn’t a planned ‘hole’ in coverage, its about return on investment. Too few people in rural areas for 4 networks to cover. So SRN is where the Govt funds a neutral mast location that the operators can add their hardware to.
I would like to see the proposed merger of Three and Vodafone permitted on condition that the 4G signal coverage is improved.
Perhaps lets start by Ofcom actually forcing the 4 operators to use the same measurement method, so we can compare?
I wonder if there will ever be such extensive 5G coverage? I have no desire for 5G myself.
Yes, because you won’t care its 5G, you just care for connectivity. In 10 years time we will have forgotten 4G, but everyone will still be using the same services. Just more people using more services at the same time. That is what 4/5/6/… G gives us.
23 years of broadband connectivity since 1999 trial - Live BQM