User comments on ISPs
  >> Other Providers (without dedicated forums)


Register (or login) on our website and you will not see this ad.


Pages in this thread: 1 | 2 | [3] | 4 | (show all)   Print Thread
Standard User Pheasant
(eat-sleep-adslguide) Fri 15-Nov-24 16:20:17
Print Post

Re: BRSK Full Fibre Broadband


[re: candlerb] [link to this post]
 
CF isn’t particularly national either. It’s pretty much just London with a few other SE pockets with Box
Standard User pluralist
(eat-sleep-adslguide) Fri 15-Nov-24 16:45:03
Print Post

Re: BRSK Full Fibre Broadband


[re: Pheasant] [link to this post]
 
Yes I know. I also know how to suck eggs tongue wink. My grandmother taught me.

We know that the organized workers of the country are our friends. As for the rest, they don’t matter a tinker’s cuss - Manny Shinwell

Connections: Pixel 9 on Three 4+ (LTE)/5G, Pixel 6a on EE in reserve. At home Three Mobile, with (Three)ZTE MC888 router giving 5G on a good day.
Standard User pluralist
(eat-sleep-adslguide) Fri 15-Nov-24 16:51:31
Print Post

Re: BRSK Full Fibre Broadband


[re: Pheasant] [link to this post]
 
In the end there will have to be a consolidation, as in the way VM came into being that I pointed out earlier. The only questions are how and when it will come about. Five years maybe. Almost certainly less than ten.

A slight chance of CityFibre and one other. It depends on when and where the big money lands.

We know that the organized workers of the country are our friends. As for the rest, they don’t matter a tinker’s cuss - Manny Shinwell

Connections: Pixel 9 on Three 4+ (LTE)/5G, Pixel 6a on EE in reserve. At home Three Mobile, with (Three)ZTE MC888 router giving 5G on a good day.


Register (or login) on our website and you will not see this ad.

Standard User Pheasant
(eat-sleep-adslguide) Fri 15-Nov-24 16:55:05
Print Post

Re: BRSK Full Fibre Broadband


[re: pluralist] [link to this post]
 
The point is they weren’t minnows - ntl and Telewest were already large national players. The minnows had been swallowed up years prior (with ensuing loads of debt on the balance sheet).

Branson also did have a stake at the time, rather than just leasing them the trade mark as now.

Maybe time for that afternoon walk 😎😂
Standard User Pheasant
(eat-sleep-adslguide) Fri 15-Nov-24 16:56:47
Print Post

Re: BRSK Full Fibre Broadband


[re: pluralist] [link to this post]
 
We’re already well in it. The music stopped a while ago. It’s just we’ve all got headphones on like a silent disco. 😂
Standard User pluralist
(eat-sleep-adslguide) Fri 15-Nov-24 17:32:50
Print Post

Re: BRSK Full Fibre Broadband


[re: Pheasant] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by Pheasant:
The point is they weren’t minnows - ntl and Telewest were already large national players. The minnows had been swallowed up years prior (with ensuing loads of debt on the balance sheet).
That confirms what I've been saying. We are just at a much earlier stage.
Branson also did have a stake at the time, rather than just leasing them the trade mark as now.
So? Effectively sold his minnow to NTL like the others.

We know that the organized workers of the country are our friends. As for the rest, they don’t matter a tinker’s cuss - Manny Shinwell

Connections: Pixel 9 on Three 4+ (LTE)/5G, Pixel 6a on EE in reserve. At home Three Mobile, with (Three)ZTE MC888 router giving 5G on a good day.
Standard User jchamier
(eat-sleep-adslguide) Fri 15-Nov-24 19:33:20
Print Post

Re: BRSK Full Fibre Broadband


[re: pluralist] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by pluralist:
VM started as loads of minnows.
in an era of more favourable financial lending; and the “minnows” ended up with a tonne of debt that is still being serviced and will be for many years.

(Also it's nothing to do with Virgin itself except for licensing the name).
Even Virgin Atlantic rents the name from Virgin Enterprises. That is how Branson always made his money; nothing new there. VM have more of a right to the name when the NTL:Telewest merged company purchased Virgin Mobile, which at the time was owned by Virgin Enterprises.

24 years of broadband connectivity since 1999 trial - Live BQM
Standard User jchamier
(eat-sleep-adslguide) Fri 15-Nov-24 19:36:31
Print Post

Re: BRSK Full Fibre Broadband


[re: pluralist] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by pluralist:
In the end there will have to be a consolidation, as in the way VM came into being that I pointed out earlier. The only questions are how and when it will come about. Five years maybe. Almost certainly less than ten.


I actually think more will go bankrupt. If Virgin Media’s NetCo announcement works, and with their overbuild of the DOCSIS coax with XGS-PON gets into the same speed as Nexfibre’s growth then they could become the only real competitor to Openreach.

A slight chance of CityFibre and one other. It depends on when and where the big money lands.

CityFibre in two towns I visit has stalled; when the money went wrong (after Putin’s european war) over 50% of these towns has not been started or even look being installed. They may be a “busted flush”.

24 years of broadband connectivity since 1999 trial - Live BQM
Standard User pluralist
(eat-sleep-adslguide) Sat 16-Nov-24 01:49:42
Print Post

Re: BRSK Full Fibre Broadband


[re: jchamier] [link to this post]
 
They aren't like Thames Water hat the government(s) daren't let go bust. If an AltNet goes broke another will buy its stuff for peanuts. That's how consolidation works.

PS: Jacob Rees-Mogg says Thames Water should be allowed to go under for that reason. Get rid of the debt burden.

We know that the organized workers of the country are our friends. As for the rest, they don’t matter a tinker’s cuss - Manny Shinwell

Connections: Pixel 9 on Three 4+ (LTE)/5G, Pixel 6a on EE in reserve. At home Three Mobile, with (Three)ZTE MC888 router giving 5G on a good day.
Standard User candlerb
(knowledge is power) Sat 16-Nov-24 09:49:09
Print Post

Re: BRSK Full Fibre Broadband


[re: pluralist] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by pluralist:
PS: Jacob Rees-Mogg says Thames Water should be allowed to go under for that reason. Get rid of the debt burden.

For once, I agree with him.

If it's a private company then the investors and banking backers should take the risks as well as the rewards, especially when it's been milked for years as a cash cow (dividends withdrawn at the same time as unsustainable debts building up)

Who exactly ends up with those assets is really the question - plus, what do you do to stop the new company ending up in exactly the same situation.
Pages in this thread: 1 | 2 | [3] | 4 | (show all)   Print Thread

Jump to