"Do you really think that the postings here by an ex-customer really made PlusNet change? Do you not think it more likely that the successful sale to BT and the exit of the people at the top allowed PlusNet to move back towards where it used to be? "

That was what I assumed had begun the recent changes. Very quickly after the top people in Plusnet left you could see a change in the motivation and confidence of the people remaining at Plusnet for the better.

> Do you really think that the postings here by an ex-customer really made PlusNet change?

I don't think it magically did anything but he did keep some problems visible.. Maybe it would have happened anyway.. I don't know.. but I wouldn't be so quick to dismiss it as some people.

seb

Wingco even for you thats getting silly...

> > I know there are other definitions which refer to simply a ficticious statement etc.
> But you chose to use the one which adds weight to your argument.

The world is full of contradictions and as others have pointed out people pick words sometimes which allow them to encourage one assumption but then claim another meaning.

Become an MP and go and tell the PM he 'lied' and watch the reaction.. Try that with some other words and see the difference.


> Therefore your decision to ban Simon was made on an opinion, and not a factual basis.

Every human interaction is opinion.. Simon is very good at using the words he wants to get the desired effect.. He would be a very good politician I'm sure.


seb

>The problem is that for some of us it is not possible to improve the service that we are getting from PlusNet. For one I get the speed that I need whenever I need it for a price that I am willing to pay, and never reach my allocated bandwidth.

I'm not sure why you would then consider my work to be trying to help you.

>I know that is a bit of an "I'm all right Jack" attitude, and my demands on the Internet are much less than some others, but there are plenty like me for whom your attempt to help do not seem like that at all. If it ain't broke then you telling me how to fix it is pointless.

If you are unaffected, as you claim, then surely you can ignore my posts as they have no impact or concern on the operation of your service? Should you chose to be critical of any of my efforts it would be rather pointless as once again you would be doing so when you are unaffected. Therefore I don't fully understand why you would think that I am telling you on how to fix something when it isn't needed.

"Wingco even for you thats getting silly... "

Can you not comment on a issue without getting personal?

Seb managed to answer it without resorting in insults!

> Seb managed to answer it without resorting in insults!

How do you know what insults I'm screaming at my screen ? :-p

seb

In reply to:

---

Wingco even for you thats getting silly...

---

Paddy I'm going to say what I think, then I'll leave you to your precious ISP. Look at your posts on this subject, the majority are having a pop at someone. Look at your posts over the last couple of months in this forum, the majority are personal and insulting. If anyone should have had a three month ban it certainly wasn't Simon!!!.

Post deleted by paddyclark

counted to ten and thought better of it...

Edited by deleted (Thu 10-May-07 23:28:52)

>How do you know what insults I'm screaming at my screen ? :-p

What we don't know can't harm us