I am not arguing the method used to end his employment.
Terminating the employment, allowing them to resign or even performance-managing someone out of business is standard practice and changes nothing.
My point, which I perhaps have not been able to articulate well earlier, is that PN did not deem the person competent and hence the direct correlation to his departure. How this departure occurred on a legal or formal basis is irrelevant. The fact the person no longer works there is attributed directly to his incompetence.
That much the statement makes clear.
edit giving a person the option to resign is tantamount to being fired by a caring employer.
edit 2: caring employer can sometimes also be translated to one covering their backside for legal reasons.
Edited by rsharma (Thu 07-Sep-06 15:47:56)



Pages in this thread:
Print Thread
rsharma