After a few weeks I started reading the forums again and followed the link to the 'LLU opt out' request and raised a ticket using this method. The response was as follows:
Your original question 9:50pm, Wednesday 13th September 2006
[Support Wizard Journey] [I would like to opt out of the LLU upgrade programme] [Trials Wizard] [LLU Opt Out] [Additional Information] I would like to opt out of the LLU upgrade programme.
Script User Unused - ADC - Developers 6:15am, Thursday 14th September 2006
Please take this response as acknowledgement of your request to remain on BT provided service, no changes will be made to your connection.
Regards
Customer Support
Right then, can anybody spot the deliberate mistake. Were Poornet lying when they said my friend needed a new ISP that accepted LLU migrations. The above response clearly states that my friends connection is still on a BT provided service and no changes will be made to this. Also, my friend can successfully use the BT speedchecker - does this also prove that BT are providing the service - would the BT speedchecker still work of the connection was being provided by Tiscali. I was under the impression that if you were on LLU and a change back to IPstream was requested it would take a lot longer than the 8 hours and 25 minutes it took PN to reply. Mind you, is 8 hours 25 a record response time for PN. Also, what's the real method of determining if my friend is on Tiscali LLU.
Have I got it all wrong?
Edited by robshaws (Sun 17-Sep-06 00:25:58)



Print Thread
robshaws