User comments on ISPs
  >> PlusNet plc


Register (or login) on our website and you will not see this ad.


These posts have been archived and can no longer be replied to or modified.
Pages in this thread: 1 | 2 | 3 | [4] | (show all)   Print Thread
Standard User camieabz
(legend) Fri 29-Sep-06 01:44:18
Print Post

Re: Signing up to Plusnet problem


[re: rsharma] [link to this post]
 
It's been common knowledge for a while now that if you want heavy P2P or Usenet, then don't use Plusnet.

When angry, count to four; when very angry, swear.

Camie

SAR 715...plusnet...1944 / 248

~ The AG'ers Mugshots ~

~ Camie's Forums ~
Standard User rsharma
(fountain of knowledge) Fri 29-Sep-06 02:01:06
Print Post

Re: Signing up to Plusnet problem


[re: camieabz] [link to this post]
 
I agree with that statement except for the use of the word 'heavy'. I was using on average 3-5 GB/month on Premier and even so never received a good speed on P2P or my 'clean-to' allowance (as it was then known).

There are 3 or 4 threads which I contributed to at the time without resolution. It was apparent to me the reasons for the slow speeds but it took me almost two weeks to figure out what was going on because it was denied then and in many ways still being denied now. Perhaps 'denied now' is not the correct description but the explanations given do not discuss the traffic shaping effects in conjunction with the limited bandwidth PN have. People are being told that the new Ecolaya (SP?) signatures will remove the issues, without admission that it will not become better until PN invest in more bandwidth.

Anyway, the only reason I posted to the two threads today in relation to technical issues that don't affect me directly is only to post contradictory information that I knew to be true for a lot of people and not to undermine posts by other current users or even in some way attack PN. I like to normally stay out of these type of threads for obvious reasons and I will try to stay away from these type of threads if I am misunderstood in my reasons for posting to them.

edit: double negative deleted

Edited by rsharma (Fri 29-Sep-06 10:14:42)

Standard User darkangel
(regular) Fri 29-Sep-06 07:16:57
Print Post

Re: Signing up to Plusnet problem


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
i totally agree too got similar speeds 1-5k so i've migrated away to ukfsn and noticed a marked improvement.

Darren


Register (or login) on our website and you will not see this ad.

Standard User mr_mojo
(knowledge is power) Fri 29-Sep-06 17:17:40
Print Post

Re: Signing up to Plusnet problem


[re: ScaryMonkey] [link to this post]
 
Some pipes are differently loaded than others. Some are horiffically overloaded and some quiet. As for the other statement, that's just claptrap. There is no reason that BT would be any slower (or faster) than yours for anything else than config issues.
Standard User blewit
(regular) Fri 29-Sep-06 17:29:22
Print Post

Re: Signing up to Plusnet problem


[re: mr_mojo] [link to this post]
 
In reply to:

Some pipes are differently loaded than others. Some are horiffically overloaded and some quiet. As for the other statement, that's just claptrap. There is no reason that BT would be any slower (or faster) than yours for anything else than config issues.




Actually there is - it's "likely" [In the PlusNet sense of the word obviously] that the LLU exchanges provide speed over 8Mb before BT release a higher speed wholesale product ... which is probably what is being referred to here ...
Standard User michaelh
(experienced) Fri 29-Sep-06 17:34:16
Print Post

Re: Signing up to Plusnet problem


[re: camieabz] [link to this post]
 
When I was with PN - it was impossible to become a heavy user of P2P - it was a struggle to download anything at all!

Michael

Moved my main account from PN to IDNet as soon as I saw that my exchange was on the Tiscali LLU List and never regretted it, but still have a PAYG Account for PN at my other house
Pages in this thread: 1 | 2 | 3 | [4] | (show all)   Print Thread

Jump to