Where is TBB based? Surrey? Nice spot for a meeting of TBB members....

Simon

>I think the idea is to let people have an idea of how PN works which is obviously not possible in any other location.

TBH I think the people you are looking for to attend aren't so bothered how it works in their building, it's more to do with their policies, and facts and figures.

> Where is TBB based? Surrey? Nice spot for a meeting of TBB members....

Servers are in Docklands :-p
People are all over. We don't operate out of one office or central location.. All over south of UK more precisely

If this was TBB only thing I'd look at London..


seb

In reply to:

---

TBH I think the people you are looking for to attend aren't so bothered how it works in their building, it's more to do with their policies, and facts and figures.

---

It's very easy to criticise things on figures alone.. I think there's more behind a company and it's useful to see.

If there's no interest in this we'll call it off and I'll spend my end of May doing something I might enjoy more.

seb

>It's very easy to criticise things on figures alone.. I think there's more behind a company and it's useful to see.

I do agree with that, I would think it would be very intresting and worthwhile to see the whole PN set up.
But judging by comments of some on here it would need to be more London based IMO.

Funny how some have a LOT to say when hiding behind a keyboard but shy away when given the chance to say it face to face.

Not such a bad thing really, people are a lot less inhibited online.

Which day do you prefer George, Friday or Saturday?

Yes, you have it right.

The things that I'm interested in don't warrant travelling from London because they require a simple change in attitude and acceptance of the law. The reply by Dave earlier proves to me that they won't, at least not voluntarily.

The main issues that I challenge are twofold:
1. The changes to packages because PN don't consider the package description (sign up pages) and their associated traffic shaping/throttling pages to form part of the contract and hence not requiring notice when changes are made.
2. The rewriting of history and/or lies that often accompany their marketing attempts or replies to forum posts.

The latter is not critical and I don't loose sleep over it. The former doesn't require meeting PN because having to convince a company when they have access to their own legal team proves to me that they are either being given poor advice or (foolishly) ignoring it. In either case there is little I can do through discussion and hence why I have been dealing directly with Ofcom (it is an official route that they can't ignore).

I do, however, wish you all the best and hope you can make good progress on the issues that are important to you.

[edit] deleted superfluous statements.

Edited by rsharma (Sun 29-Apr-07 09:51:08)

>Funny how some have a LOT to say when hiding behind a keyboard but shy away when given the chance to say it face to face.

My sentiments exactly...

Edited by rsharma (Sun 29-Apr-07 00:50:04)