WOW - 3 months, that is well too harsh.

Well done. I am sorry to say I agree wholeheartedly with your decision.. When a decent thread is going pr100 will often hijack it.

Now if you want a short list of other candiates...

I dont think its too harsh when you take into account that he has been banned already a couple of times before this. He also had ample chance and warning this time as well.

lol. So ironic that pr100 probably had far more (constructive) influence on plusnet than the PUG ever did and he was just one man.

AG never did like him though, all the mod replies were very patronising and he always got jumped on. Quite why, I'm not sure. But whatever, he seems to have made enemies here.

Oh well Simon, if you're reading this, a lot of people appreciate the work you put in to get PN to shape up their act.

Whether we like Simon or not, his contributions:

1) May have been boring to some people

2) Were certainly instrumental in the shaping of today's Plusnet

I think deep down Plusnet knew he was right, as well as RSHARMA and I would like to think that PN did take onboard both of their criticisms to make it a better company for people to buy BB from.

imho I have always got on with Simon, he stands his ground and like a lot of us, just wanted whats right.

I can see why TBB have done this but imho 3 months is just too long.

I think it stinks of being in PN's pocket, of victimisation and of bias.

Without any question pr100 brought about more change than any other person or group and both PN and TBB will be poorer without him. But if anything inspires pr to find new ways of getting his views across, victimisation of him inspires that to happen. It was being chucked out of PN, when they thought they could be rid of him that brought the problems to a wider audience than PN's own boards.

Making him a martyr will not silence him, but only brings TBB into disrepute.

It leaves more than a nasty taste in one's mouth.

So if this post gets me a ban too, goodbye just in case.

Edited by deleted (Wed 09-May-07 16:59:50)

Its an ISP, get a grip. It is not some holy crusade. While at first i think he made some very valid points and stood his ground for which i would commend him, it just got silly in the end. I remember something about now BT has taken over i am done, did this happen, no. I will say no more as pr100 is not here to defend any of this.

On a side note i do think 3 months is harsh, but then again i do not run this site.

"Its an ISP"
Perhaps that should be the punchline on every Watchdog programme.
Its only a car firm, a debt collecting agency, a corrupt business a biased forum.

In reply to:

---

This should not be construed as a ban on fierce debate, provided it remains constructive, on both sides.

---

How else can it be construed . I would remind you and the mods that Simons debates were usually constructive, until the "one liner insult brigade" reared their collective heads.

Regardless of your reassurances to the contrary, your words and actions suggest that you want only pro Plusnet comments, so why not be open and honest and say so .

Will be nice to see some threads developing without constant interruptions!
I find pr100 so repetitive!

Edited by deleted (Wed 09-May-07 18:49:36)