Probably a fair enough concern. If for example, those staff who are currently interested in spending their spare time translating, lost their enthusiasm. Or if those staff able to provide any other part of the backup support to this move leave.

But in the mean time, it looks like a fun idea

Nice of you to mention a banned user without him afforded a means of reply.

bs0d.

Since when has rsharma been banned?

I thought he had started a clean slate... oh wait.. wrong branch of the thread

>Nice of you to mention a banned user without him afforded a means of reply.

??????? The pleasure of me banning him has yet to come.

I did post it with the thought that he would appreciate the joke!

If not, me bad.

If you want pleasure, ban someone and revel in the joy of your power.... then re-instate them and revel in the glory of your secrecy and cunning

I'm sure if rsharma was about he would appreciate the joke regarding new and interesting (or incomprehensible) T&C's to read.

In reply to:

---

>Nice of you to mention a banned user without him afforded a means of reply.

... I did post it with the thought that he would appreciate the joke!

---

Probably he would appreciate the joke, but if he is living under a ban, I would say that making the joke without affording the opportunity of reply would be a tad ill-judged. Banned or not, he is part of the community and should not have his hands tied behind his back. If he is under a ban, it should be lifted straight away, out of fairness.

Oops , caught in a time warp here obviously.

Appologies all round then i guess

bs0d.

>If he is under a ban, it should be lifted straight away, out of fairness.

No way would I make reference to a member where the forum prevented a response.

You must have missed my ???????????? when it was suggested it was so.

OK, tis me having a moment.