In reply to:
�125 is a hell of a lot to pay just to activate a line
A standardised fee, unfortunately (after all, someone needed to pay for the lines to be installed).
On the counter-side of the argument, you'd be pretty pleased if you got a line installed for �125, when it cost BT �3,000 to install it!
As for the �10 (ish) line rental, you'll have to pay it to someone. They all charge about this amount (give, or take a quid). The Sky talk for �5 doesn't include the line rental, nor does their broadband.
The only thing you'll have to pay, which you may not have been expecting, is the �125.
The part of the �125 install fee I don't agree with is on old houses.
There's no way in Hell it costs BT �125 to re-activate a phone line which has only been dead for a few hours.
It's a bit like bank charges. It looks like steps are being made to ensure bank charges are relative to the actual costs, so why aren't phone reconnection fees (otherwise, by the time a house is 30 years old, BT could easily have collected �1,000 to install the socket once).
Ade
ADSL2+ with BE
DL Sync Blimey....4707kbps now!
UL Sync 1088kbps