Does anyone design a product with a problem that should be there in the first place ?
Yep. Most consumer goods manufacturers. It gets called fashion, planned obsolescence, and all sorts of other things, but it amounts to a problem of some sort that is deliberate and/or inherent. Often, they could build better products, but that would be too costly. Costly to you because they would cost a lot to buy or to the manufacturers because they would last too long and thus mean you wouldn't need to buy new ones as often.
For example; the internal trim of fridges is deliberately flimsy because this offsets the extraordinary level of reliability that is inherent in the hermetically sealed compressor and condenser/evaporator. Additionally, the functional part of fridges has not changed in decades. They cannot be improved with new faster processors or new programming features or whatever. They are just about the most reliable electromechanical devices ever created. If the interior of a fridge was as robust as the one in a dishwasher (something that would't actually add a vast amount to the cost) the chances are that a fridge wouldn't just outlive its owner, but could even outlive their children. Of course, what actually happens is that the deliberately flimsy door shelf or door seal or something else breaks or something purely cosmetic breaks or the nasty sprayed brown colour goes out of fashion. The colour bit is part of the ongoing attempt to bring fashion trends into 'white' goods and make you buy stuff more often than you need to.
Des
The original 32 bit junkie now snorting pure 64. Sky Broadband, Wired, Wireless, VoIP, 2 Macs, 2.5 Hackintoshes, 3.5 PCs, iPhone, OS X, Windows XP, Windows 7, Ubuntu.
Rehab is for quitters
The original 32 bit junkie now snorting pure 64. Sky Broadband, Wired, Wireless, VoIP, 2 Macs, 2.5 Hackintoshes, 3.5 PCs, iPhone, OS X, Windows XP, Windows 7, Ubuntu.
Rehab is for quitters



Pages in this thread:
Print Thread
Desmond