User comments on ISPs
  >> TalkTalk Broadband


Register (or login) on our website and you will not see this ad.


Pages in this thread: 1 | [2] | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | (show all)   Print Thread
Standard User deleted
(deleted) Mon 07-Feb-11 20:00:55
Print Post

Re: Talktalk - Should be faster, surely?


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
Don't waste your time reading any Jack_Hackett posts. He's learnt his online etiquette at the school of TalkTalk telephone support.

As I said in my ealier post to get the issue sorted go to the Talktalkmembers forums where the OCE's do have a good reputation for sorting problems out. It can take a few days over the internet but it is far more successful than telephone support.
Standard User deleted
(deleted) Mon 07-Feb-11 20:06:22
Print Post

Re: Talktalk - Should be faster, surely?


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by Deputy_Dog:
Don't waste your time reading any Jack_Hackett posts. He's learnt his online etiquette at the school of TalkTalk telephone support.

As I said in my ealier post to get the issue sorted go to the Talktalkmembers forums where the OCE's do have a good reputation for sorting problems out. It can take a few days over the internet but it is far more successful than telephone support.


Ha ha, you may have stumbled onto something there, he does always seem a bit keen to post garbage in any thread that isn't praising the lord for giving us TT smile

Have tried to register over there, but unfortunately as you said, the registration randomly failed. I've used the contactus form.

I'm not concerned if it takes a few days, I'm not in any real rush, so thats fine for me. Generally happy with everything else so theres no problems.
Standard User Jack_Hackett
(knowledge is power) Mon 07-Feb-11 20:11:45
Print Post

Re: Talktalk - Should be faster, surely?


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by anarchist125:
In reply to a post by Jack_Hackett:
Maybe in future you could provide the full facts in the OP then others would not waste their time repeating what you already know, in the meantime kindly blow it out your donkey smart ass.


Heh, not such a smart assed reply this time? Well done on looking like a complete clown. You do amuse me.


You conveniently missed this part of the same post jackass.

"It was a joke but do you seriously expect us to believe your line goes slow, you ring them, they flick a switch and you are back to full speed again for a few months"


Register (or login) on our website and you will not see this ad.

Standard User Jack_Hackett
(knowledge is power) Mon 07-Feb-11 20:13:12
Print Post

Re: Talktalk - Should be faster, surely? *DELETED*


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
Post deleted by billford
Standard User Jack_Hackett
(knowledge is power) Mon 07-Feb-11 20:14:51
Print Post

Re: Talktalk - Should be faster, surely?


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by anarchist125:
In reply to a post by Deputy_Dog:
If you join the talktalkmembers forum and put your question to one of the OCE's in the 'Broadband Speed & Web Browsing' sub-forum then you'll find that they will better sort you problem out than ever the telephone support will.

If you haven't registered you will need to do so with talktslk details on theregistration page. If you have problems logging in as often people do then use the Contact Us link.


Cheers mate, I shall have a go with that later!


I am surprised you hadn't already found the forum signed up kissed ass and become a mod over there as you already know so much. grin
Standard User deleted
(deleted) Mon 07-Feb-11 20:18:59
Print Post

Re: Talktalk - Should be faster, surely?


[re: Jack_Hackett] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by Jack_Hackett:
In reply to a post by anarchist125:
In reply to a post by Jack_Hackett:
Maybe in future you could provide the full facts in the OP then others would not waste their time repeating what you already know, in the meantime kindly blow it out your donkey smart ass.


Heh, not such a smart assed reply this time? Well done on looking like a complete clown. You do amuse me.


You conveniently missed this part of the same post jackass.

"It was a joke but do you seriously expect us to believe your line goes slow, you ring them, they flick a switch and you are back to full speed again for a few months"


I didn't conveniently miss anything, you conveniently edited your post after I had already replied.

You really are a grade A plank, and its obvious to all.

I've already told you, give up trying to win e-points, you've clearly failed.
Standard User Jack_Hackett
(knowledge is power) Mon 07-Feb-11 20:24:23
Print Post

Re: Talktalk - Should be faster, surely? *DELETED*


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
Post deleted by billford

Edited by Jack_Hackett (Mon 07-Feb-11 20:27:24)

Standard User deleted
(deleted) Mon 07-Feb-11 20:38:48
Print Post

Re: Talktalk - Should be faster, surely? *DELETED*


[re: Jack_Hackett] [link to this post]
 
Post deleted by billford
Standard User Futaura
(committed) Mon 07-Feb-11 20:42:24
Print Post

Re: Talktalk - Should be faster, surely?


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
No doubt you'll be given all this info when you start your thread on the TTMF, but while you're waiting, have you tried connecting via the test socket (assuming your master socket has one)? It's hard to say for until you've been put onto a faster profile, but your stats (snr vs attenuation) seem to indicate that your line is noiser than what would be classed as "normal" for a line that long, so although you will get a faster speed, it may not be as fast as it should/could be. If you have a test socket and try the microfilter+router in that, this will rule out any internal wiring that could be causing interference.
Standard User Jack_Hackett
(knowledge is power) Mon 07-Feb-11 20:51:32
Print Post

Re: Talktalk - Should be faster, surely?


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
Of course it was the case, everybody can see with their own eyes that you edited your post, it says so at the bottom off it you spoon.


I thought that was my signature.

Can see it was a joke? No, it wasn't, and everybody else knows it wasn't. It was your attempt at being a smart ass, saying what I was telling you was BS. Which is the line you've continued to take, you are still saying that it is BS. Which to be honest, I don't give a turd about, as the opinion of mental patients means little to me.


Oooooo that's not very nice, anyway you obviously do give a turd as you keep coming back to point out the error of my ways, how mental does that make you?

Going through your posts, its obvious you aren't the 'joking' kind. You're just a bit bitter at the world, I don't know why.


I am not bitter I just took offence at your dig about using the web form being unhelpful, like i said if you had mentioned the fact you had already used it in your OP we would not be here now.

How on earth was most of the info missing? I said that I know it should be much faster. I didn't need you to tell me something I already knew. If you would like me to post exactly how I came to that conclusion, including my entire internet browsing history, technical training and research through the last few relevant years, then get a grip.


The second lot of info was missing from the OP I dont understand why you are having so much trouble with this.

If you weren't such a goon, posting rubbish that obviously has no substance other than BS intended to try and win at the Internet, then I wouldn't have as much to be smug about.


As i said i posted the web form speed results before you said you had already used it then you said it was unhelpful, and you call me a goon, are you [censored] retarded?

Edited by Jack_Hackett (Mon 07-Feb-11 20:54:07)

Pages in this thread: 1 | [2] | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | (show all)   Print Thread

Jump to