The reason he's going back to Plusnet is because 6 days after his SilenceSilence service was activated (for the first time, he's never been one of their users before) his account was blocked (internet access cut off). SilenceSilence have claimed he owes them over £500 from last November and refused to unblock the line until he pays. It very rapidly became apparent that he'd made a truly awful decision to move to them in the first place so he decided to return to Plusnet with his tail between his legs.

Over two weeks on and SilenceSilence haven't given him copies of any bills and his account is still blocked. The CEO's department haven't responded to a letter sent recorded delivery which was signed for 24th October at 10:32am.

That is a clear allegation that he is being fraudulent - I suggest you retract that statement!

Do please read. The fact that they have involved their Fraud department is a clear indication that they suspect fraud of some sort has taken placve. That is just a statement of fact.

Sorry - he deliberately gives false contact information - then complains when people don't - can't get in touch with him.

Maybe the £500 debt is from one of the "false" name account he has selected.

Unbelievable.

Edited by deleted (Tue 06-Nov-12 16:51:17)

Before every goes down this path further, I read it as false info when using the online checkers.

If they have given any false information when signing up, then it could create havoc and render any help from external sources invalid.

In short we are all second guessing, some for and some against.

In reply to a post by MrSaffron:

Before every goes down this path further, I read it as false info when using the online checkers.

He said "I always use my local taxi firms number... for insurance, banks, everything... lol"

As far as I know, insurance and banks don't have broadband checkers.

In reply to a post by jelv:

That is a clear allegation that he is being fraudulent - I suggest you retract that statement!

I made no allegations, and the statements I made are based on information already posted. Nothing to retract.

Defending the undefendable is where you are with this thread , i can guarantee you do not have the truth with regards to what you have been reading on the plusnet forum from this very shady individual .

It was said very early on in this thread that it did not add up and as more information has come to light , its obvious it never will add up whilst only having one version of events from a individual that openly gives fake information .

lets go back to the start of the thread where it was said " the amount owed was so close to a cancellation fee thats what it must be" and end it there .

a note to moderators, could this thread be removed? as it has become a slag off talktalk drivel started by jelv on behalf of some very dodgy character. many thanks

In reply to a post by noginthenog:

could this thread be removed?

I don't see why it should be. Both sides have stated their case, readers can make their own minds up.