|
"Other than the daft 3 month advice from the ISP, what makes you think it may be the filter"
I have only, in the last few days, learned that when 'upgrading' broadband speeds, 'consistency testing' takes place for the first 10 working days so that the ISP may discover what 'sustainable' higher speed is available on a line. I was not made aware of this necessity by my ISP at the time of entering into a new upgraded service contract.
Following contract activation my modem, BT Voyager 105, began showing a connection speed ranging between 2.1mbps and 3.7mbps but I felt this was not happening in reality. I then went to the Thinkbroadband' excellent speed testing facility. This evidenced an approximate halving of my connection speed from around 0.45mbps to around 0.2mbps, rather than getting close to the 6x increase that I had been advised was now available to me as a maximum for my line. BT's broadband test facility would not even run on my line after 'activation date'.
I contacted BT who told me they detected a 'problem' with my broadband connection and suggested I contact my ISP. This is when the filter issue arose. I felt the filter advice was daft and thought no more about it until the filter arrived (I had originally suggested not to send one!) Following my instincts and frustrated that connection speeds had reduced, I tried a different route to ISP contact. This time I was told that due to 'internal technical problems' (I now read this to mean staff and/or process failures) my account upgrade had not been activated properly. I was given a new activation date. This date passed at the end of last week. Yesterday, on contacting my ISP again, I was told that the 'internal technical problems' should be overcome in 48 hours. Something is now happening as my Thinkbroadband speed test today has shown a connection speed of more than 3x my normal average of 0.45mbps but only after a double hiccup at sign on. At the first attempt there was no broadband signal getting through. The system advised restarting the computer. At this second sign on, my broadband connection was so slow as to be unworkable. On signing on again but without restarting the computer, I obtained this 'lightning' speed - compared to what I have been used to. All of this with the old MF50 in place and both telephones working.
My initial thoughts on the new filter were that it was faulty as, on receipt, I immediately replaced the old filter after first signing off from broadband on the computer but nothing worked, as explained in my previous posts. So I commenced the laborious process of experimenting with the different connection combinations to see and confirm which combinations worked and those that didn't. This lead me to post my observations for advice on my finding. My forum post question is the only combination that doesn't work. I wondered if I had missed something - a technological 'improvement' or a fault as I initially suspected. The former now felt more logical than the latter given my experiment findings. However, before exploring ways of changing the telephone placements in my house, I thought I would seek wider confirmatory advice with a forum post on whether or not filter/doubler combinations are now effectively outlawed, as my ISP suggested, to achieve greater broadband speeds.
Apologies for the long explanation but you did ask!
|