Technical Discussion
  >> Technical Issues


Register (or login) on our website and you will not see this ad.


These posts have been archived and can no longer be replied to or modified.
Pages in this thread: 1 | [2] | (show all)   Print Thread
Standard User kwikbreaks
(knowledge is power) Tue 08-Jul-08 11:35:25
Print Post

Re: Telephone Double adapters


[re: BBSlowcoach] [link to this post]
 
With the way you are connecting it I can just about understand why there may be a ring problem - you have two phones trying to operate off the ring capactitor in the filter which is just possibly not good enough to support that (exactly the same problem as too many phones in the BT master exceeding the REN). I suppose in that regard it may well not be designed to operate with a doubler.

What I can't fathom out is why the ADSL won't connect though. You should be able to do anything on the phone side without it impacting the adsl - right up to shorting it out.

It seems to me that your new filter is suspect as to my mind it should be capable of doing what you are asking of it.
Standard User BBSlowcoach
(newbie) Tue 08-Jul-08 15:38:54
Print Post

Re: Telephone Double adapters


[re: MrSaffron] [link to this post]
 
"Other than the daft 3 month advice from the ISP, what makes you think it may be the filter"

I have only, in the last few days, learned that when 'upgrading' broadband speeds, 'consistency testing' takes place for the first 10 working days so that the ISP may discover what 'sustainable' higher speed is available on a line. I was not made aware of this necessity by my ISP at the time of entering into a new upgraded service contract.

Following contract activation my modem, BT Voyager 105, began showing a connection speed ranging between 2.1mbps and 3.7mbps but I felt this was not happening in reality. I then went to the Thinkbroadband' excellent speed testing facility. This evidenced an approximate halving of my connection speed from around 0.45mbps to around 0.2mbps, rather than getting close to the 6x increase that I had been advised was now available to me as a maximum for my line. BT's broadband test facility would not even run on my line after 'activation date'.

I contacted BT who told me they detected a 'problem' with my broadband connection and suggested I contact my ISP. This is when the filter issue arose. I felt the filter advice was daft and thought no more about it until the filter arrived (I had originally suggested not to send one!) Following my instincts and frustrated that connection speeds had reduced, I tried a different route to ISP contact. This time I was told that due to 'internal technical problems' (I now read this to mean staff and/or process failures) my account upgrade had not been activated properly. I was given a new activation date. This date passed at the end of last week. Yesterday, on contacting my ISP again, I was told that the 'internal technical problems' should be overcome in 48 hours. Something is now happening as my Thinkbroadband speed test today has shown a connection speed of more than 3x my normal average of 0.45mbps but only after a double hiccup at sign on. At the first attempt there was no broadband signal getting through. The system advised restarting the computer. At this second sign on, my broadband connection was so slow as to be unworkable. On signing on again but without restarting the computer, I obtained this 'lightning' speed - compared to what I have been used to. All of this with the old MF50 in place and both telephones working.

My initial thoughts on the new filter were that it was faulty as, on receipt, I immediately replaced the old filter after first signing off from broadband on the computer but nothing worked, as explained in my previous posts. So I commenced the laborious process of experimenting with the different connection combinations to see and confirm which combinations worked and those that didn't. This lead me to post my observations for advice on my finding. My forum post question is the only combination that doesn't work. I wondered if I had missed something - a technological 'improvement' or a fault as I initially suspected. The former now felt more logical than the latter given my experiment findings. However, before exploring ways of changing the telephone placements in my house, I thought I would seek wider confirmatory advice with a forum post on whether or not filter/doubler combinations are now effectively outlawed, as my ISP suggested, to achieve greater broadband speeds.

Apologies for the long explanation but you did ask!
Standard User BBSlowcoach
(newbie) Wed 09-Jul-08 21:43:12
Print Post

Re: Telephone Double adapters


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
Thanks "Going Digital" for the connection to your site. I hadn't looked beyond the filters supplied by my ISP. The fact three phones can be used through your XF-1e professional and exceeds the BT SIN #346 gives me some comfort about being bullied into using one phone only through a filter.


Register (or login) on our website and you will not see this ad.

Standard User BBSlowcoach
(newbie) Wed 09-Jul-08 21:51:05
Print Post

Re: Telephone Double adapters


[re: kwikbreaks] [link to this post]
 
Thanks for your analysis, "Kwikbreaks". I will take this up with my ISP. I note from "going digital" that their filter supports up to three phones so at least it eliminates my concern that faster connection speeds are dependent on no more than one phone running off the filter.
Standard User yarwell
(sensei) Wed 09-Jul-08 22:08:17
Print Post

Re: Telephone Double adapters


[re: BBSlowcoach] [link to this post]
 
In reply to:

being bullied into using one phone only through a filter.


faceplate filters, as used by BT, put all the phones through a single filter.

Phil

666 kbytes/s with Demon predominantly over fibre

MaxDSL diagnostics
Get all this Microsoft Lame! stuff off my PC !
Standard User kwikbreaks
(knowledge is power) Wed 09-Jul-08 23:07:53
Print Post

Re: Telephone Double adapters


[re: BBSlowcoach] [link to this post]
 
The filter's job is to prevent the dsl signal getting into the phones where it may cause problems and to prevent the loading of the phones attenuating the dsl signal. You can put whatever you like on the phone side of the filter and it should have no impact on the dsl. Failing to ring is a different matter.

Have you tried a single phone into the doubler? It would show whether the problem is caused by trying to run two phones off the filter or if it is a continuity type problem with the doubler.
Standard User BBSlowcoach
(newbie) Fri 11-Jul-08 17:03:23
Print Post

Re: Telephone Double adapters


[re: yarwell] [link to this post]
 
Thanks for the tip and info. As Kwikbreaks suggests 'knowledge is power'.
Standard User BBSlowcoach
(newbie) Fri 11-Jul-08 18:02:36
Print Post

Re: Telephone Double adapters


[re: kwikbreaks] [link to this post]
 
Have you tried a single phone into the doubler? It would show whether the problem is caused by trying to run two phones off the filter or if it is a continuity type problem with the doubler.
______________________________________________________________________

Thanks for the suggestion. I have tried again.

This time broadband worked with whatever combination of phone I tried where the phone is plugged directly into the filter phone socket. It worked also with the doubler in place as well whether phones were connected or not. I cannot think why broadband connectivity did not work when I first tried it. It did fail to connect on the three separate occassions that I tried.

However, with broadband now working the phones either singularly or doubly connected will not work through the doubler.

When I then revert to the original filter all connectivity combinations work. My broadband speed has not settled since the upgrade so the speed test has not been able to prove yet that the old filter is interfering with my speed upgrade.
Pages in this thread: 1 | [2] | (show all)   Print Thread

Jump to