Technical Discussion
  >> Technical Issues


Register (or login) on our website and you will not see this ad.


Pages in this thread: 1 | [2] | 3 | (show all)   Print Thread
Standard User deleted
(deleted) Sat 11-Feb-12 21:17:55
Print Post

Re: Slower sync on standard stability than on stable. Why? *DELETED*


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
Post deleted by spd
Standard User deleted
(deleted) Sun 12-Feb-12 19:12:04
Print Post

Re: Slower sync on standard stability than on stable. Why? *DELETED*


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
Post deleted by spd
Standard User deleted
(deleted) Sun 12-Feb-12 19:13:29
Print Post

Re: Slower sync on standard stability than on stable. Why?


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
This afternoon I exposed the test socket, turned everything off at the fuse box except for the sockets that the router was plugged in, and booted it up.

Instead of 10191 in the upstairs front bedroom (my study), I got 11511 in the test socket in the hall. This is the best speed I've ever synch'd at in this house.

I then replaced the faceplate, plugged into the standard socket, rebooted and the sync dropped to around 10500.

Next, I removed the ring wire. Sync rose to around 106xx.

Turned all power back on, removed faceplate and connected to test socket. 114xx.

Reconnected faceplate and started to try the extensions around the house. Dining room - adjacent to hall where test socket is. 102xx.

Upstairs bedroom, 108xx.

Lounge (immediately behind TV, DVD, PVR and VCR) - currently 11303 down, 1091 up.

So, my test socket gives the best speed at (once all electrical items back on) 114xx, but my extensions (all fitted by original builders) give wildly varying results, with the lounge being only 200K behind the test socket. At that rate, it seems that there's little more I can do at my end, so I'm open to suggestions.

TIA,

SPD.


Register (or login) on our website and you will not see this ad.

Administrator MrSaffron
(staff) Sun 12-Feb-12 20:56:59
Print Post

Re: Slower sync on standard stability than on stable. Why?


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
Locate the ADSL modem at the master socket, and fit a filtered faceplate to reduce the effect from the extensions, or dont connect them at all if you dont need them

Andrew Ferguson, [email protected]
www.thinkbroadband.com - formerly known as ADSLguide.org.uk
The author of the above post is a thinkbroadband staff member. It may not constitute an official statement on behalf of thinkbroadband.
Standard User deleted
(deleted) Sun 12-Feb-12 21:47:20
Print Post

Re: Slower sync on standard stability than on stable. Why?


[re: MrSaffron] [link to this post]
 
By which you mean leave it plugged straight into the test socket, and leave the faceplate out - thereby removing the extensions from the loop?

TIA,

SPD.
Administrator MrSaffron
(staff) Sun 12-Feb-12 22:30:57
Print Post

Re: Slower sync on standard stability than on stable. Why?


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
Yes

Andrew Ferguson, [email protected]
www.thinkbroadband.com - formerly known as ADSLguide.org.uk
The author of the above post is a thinkbroadband staff member. It may not constitute an official statement on behalf of thinkbroadband.
Standard User deleted
(deleted) Mon 13-Feb-12 10:46:00
Print Post

Re: Slower sync on standard stability than on stable. Why?


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
I am exhausted with idea about your case because your previous STAT:

SNR Down 5.9 Up 6.9
Attenuation Down 27.0 Up 9.1
Output Power Down (Reads as Zero) Up 12.9
Attainable rate Down 12940 Up 1024
Actual rate Down 10191 Up 1019

You appeared to have reasonable SNRs and lower downstream ATT, which should enable you to have much HIGHER downstream Sync Rate. However your subsequent trials showed that this is NOT the case even you tried that on your Test-Socket and disconnected your Ring-Wire, despite it does show some signs of speed increased, about 12% only. Sorry to ask you that question, it seems that there is a Sync Speed-capped some where to around 11Mbps despite your line and its conditions could allow for much higher!!
Administrator MrSaffron
(staff) Mon 13-Feb-12 13:38:14
Print Post

Re: Slower sync on standard stability than on stable. Why?


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
A banded profile is possible if its a WBC ADSL2+ service.

Also Sky DLM does operate capping too.

Andrew Ferguson, [email protected]
www.thinkbroadband.com - formerly known as ADSLguide.org.uk
The author of the above post is a thinkbroadband staff member. It may not constitute an official statement on behalf of thinkbroadband.
Standard User deleted
(deleted) Mon 13-Feb-12 14:22:50
Print Post

Re: Slower sync on standard stability than on stable. Why?


[re: MrSaffron] [link to this post]
 
Enta WBC 21CN is what I believe that I'm on, but I thought bands weren't applied beyond 8128?

SPD.

Edited by deleted (Mon 13-Feb-12 14:24:55)

Administrator MrSaffron
(staff) Mon 13-Feb-12 17:21:08
Print Post

Re: Slower sync on standard stability than on stable. Why?


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
http://community.plus.net/library/broadband/dynamic-...

Covers the bands and seems to match my memory

Andrew Ferguson, [email protected]
www.thinkbroadband.com - formerly known as ADSLguide.org.uk
The author of the above post is a thinkbroadband staff member. It may not constitute an official statement on behalf of thinkbroadband.
Pages in this thread: 1 | [2] | 3 | (show all)   Print Thread

Jump to