I didn't even know about the line data access!
I've just had a look and it seems the data indicates that my line speed has been identical for the past month (upstream: 19999, downstream: 79911, sync rate: 79911).
I download and upload large files frequently, and sometimes find myself noticing the difference in speed compared to when I used Virgin Media (on the few occasions it worked...). That's probably why I became fixated on my speed test, when it reality it probably won't make any difference if I did manage to eke out those last few Mbps.
You're absolutely right in that that Zen are great, especially compared to Virgin Media, in every aspect. Zen is far superior when it comes to gaming too.
But I do wonder why ISPs don't simply advertise a real-world minimum guaranteed download/upload speed for a given address rather than go by sync speeds, taking into consideration the known protocol overheads.
I can see how that would be challenging given so many variables to account for, but I'm sure it's possible. Especially when there's been such an uproar about advertised internet speeds for so long. As a consumer, I would be chuffed if my speed tests came out better than my minimum guaranteed speeds (shockingly, Virgin Media actually seem to do this).
I would venture that many consumers don't know about sync speeds and protocol overheads (I didn't until I started researching here, none of my friends and family did either when asked).
It feels a bit like buying a pizza but one of the slices is inedible because it's stuck to the lid.
I so wish I had FTTP coming to my area, but that appears to be a few years away at the very least.



Pages in this thread:
Print Thread
