Surely, they couldn't move the phone as there was already a BT phone line in place?
To me , this means you tried to change the contract - which is not allowed as part of the "one move" mentioned in the contract.
There is a line there as there was in this property the line in this property was connected to BT and that was in another persons name (the ex-wife's) I doubt the line at the new place I will be moving to is active and as there was letters from two previous tenants but not one was for a phone line then it may have been inactive for some time.
All I asked O2 to do was move my service from one property to another as I am entitled within the terms of the O2 contract, it was only after questioning the £86 and saying that there was a line in that the rep said that a service couldn't be provided
In my opinion I have stuck to the terms of the contract I asked for the service to be moved to a new property and just queried the £86 they wanted to charge with the reason the rep gave
Installation of a line
this is when he came back with
not able to provide a service
When checking postcodes within the areas I had told the council I would accept (this address I asked O2 to move my services to didn't show that they could not supply a phone service to until after I had asked for my service to be moved all the checking was done on a mobile phone internet connection and the royal mail to get the post codes and a broadband connection at a previous address, all-in-all I covered a very large number of post codes
IMHO I don't think O2 have a case they can win as if I am reading what you are saying correctly then they are basically using unfair terms and conditions to withhold a service they say they are offering.