Apparently the wireless, and he seems to want to use it. What should I ask Be?

In reply to a post by RobertoS:

Apparently the wireless, and he seems to want to use it. What should I ask Be?

If you want to do something with the wireless and you have asked BE, the question is what have you asked BE?

In reply to a post by BatBoy:

In reply to a post by RobertoS:

Apparently the wireless, and he seems to want to use it. What should I ask Be?

If you want to do something with the wireless and you have asked BE, the question is what have you asked BE?

I'm very confused about why you keep talking to me about this. Did you mean to ask the OP?

In reply to a post by RobertoS:

In reply to a post by BatBoy:

In reply to a post by RobertoS:

Apparently the wireless, and he seems to want to use it. What should I ask Be?

If you want to do something with the wireless and you have asked BE, the question is what have you asked BE?

I'm very confused about why you keep talking to me about this. Did you mean to ask the OP?

I already did.

You originally asked "What about the wireless?"

There was an off-chance you hadn't noticed the first post, where he said he couldn't get it to work. Which wasn't what he said in the post to which you replied. He merely said he was awaiting a reply from Be about it.

Maybe he wanted to know the maximum number of concurrent wireless connections possible? Or was "n" available.

So I, helpfully I thought, gave you a link to it.

You replied to that as though I were the OP, "And... what about it? What doesn't work? What have you asked BE?"

In reply to a post by RobertoS:

You originally asked "What about the wireless?"

There was an off-chance you hadn't noticed the first post, where he said he couldn't get it to work. Which wasn't what he said in the post to which you replied. He merely said he was awaiting a reply from Be about it.

Maybe he wanted to know the maximum number of concurrent wireless connections possible? Or was "n" available.

So I, helpfully I thought, gave you a link to it.

You replied to that as though I were the OP, "And... what about it? What doesn't work? What have you asked BE?"

That's what I asked.

You asked me. Not the OP.

I asked the OP. You answered.

In reply to a post by BatBoy:

I asked the OP. You answered.

I've explained my first answer to you. I don't think I can do so any more simply. I've also pointed out that following my first answer to you, you asked me some direct questions, none of which are applicable to me.

The only question you have asked the OP is "What about the wireless?". He is yet to respond.

In reply to a post by RobertoS:

In reply to a post by BatBoy:

I asked the OP. You answered.

I've explained my first answer to you. I don't think I can do so any more simply. I've also pointed out that following my first answer to you, you asked me some direct questions, none of which are applicable to me.

The only question you have asked the OP is "What about the wireless?". He is yet to respond.

Yes, he's noticeable by his absence.