In reply to a post by burakkucat:

In reply to a post by BatBoy:

Does the AAISP guarantee apply to BE-based lines?

No doubt you will give me your opinion.

Personally, I'm not bothered one way or the other. My only concern is to give the OP a pointer as to how he can get the defect(s) of his current infrastructure resolved. When the metallic path problem is fixed, he could then, if he so desires, migrate to Be.

Thank you for your interest in what I have posted. I do not wish to join any debate about the merits (or otherwise) of Be because, quite simply, I have no experience of that provider.

Somebody has already answered and it appears your advice was faulty.

In reply to a post by BatBoy:

Somebody has already answered and it appears your advice was faulty.

So now you have decided to reduce Nikki Redwood to "somebody".

Here is some more advice for you:

(1) Go back to the first, the opening post of this thread and re-read it. You will then, hopefully, see that the OP is not with Be but currently with another LLU CP, TalkTalk. Please do not bother waffling on about needing to do a RTD before joining A&A. That is well known.

(2) Remember that I will not tolerate any of your meddling or attempts to become the focus of this current thread. In similar circumstances, I have requested that your behaviour is observed and that action should be taken if you "cross the line". I am prepared to do the same, once again.

(3) Act in a sensible, logical and knowledgeable fashion -- as I know you can -- and we will be able to happily co-exist. Unfortunately you are prone to being your own worst enemy.

Post as much as you like -- or dare -- in this thread. From this point on, you will not elicit any further response from me. However I will continue to monitor this thread.

In reply to a post by burakkucat:

In reply to a post by BatBoy:

Somebody has already answered and it appears your advice was faulty.

So now you have decided to reduce Nikki Redwood to "somebody".

Here is some more advice for you:

I don't need your advice, it's invariably wrong.

Nicola or Nic but never Nikki or Nicky

In reply to a post by nredwood:

Nicola or Nic but never Nikki or Nicky

My apologies, Ma'am.

In reply to a post by burakkucat:

In reply to a post by nredwood:

Nicola or Nic but never Nikki or Nicky

My apologies, Ma'am.

Feel free to apologise to the OP also.

Apology accepted

Unfortunately expecting the resident troll to read or comprehend anything is wishfful at the best. Batboy would not know how to read or make any sense.

You are part of anonymous group and as such will be reported to the police.

Well .... after many calls to Talk-Talk they say that all they can do is twiddle my line parameters, and are unable to activate BT to do anything .... that I have to do myself. Twiddling my line parameters does not give me a workable service ... I can only sync when making a phone call now. Talk-Talk maintain that I must have a line problem (not surprisingly) about which they can do nothing. Of course, were I to get my voice service from them, then that would be different !
I thought that ISPs rented facilities from BT which, if they didn't work, they should call BT on. I am quite sure that the BT engineer from Mumbai will tell me that "you have a very excellent line Sir" and I will get no action ... I have been here before. Is the relationship between BT and ISPS always like this, or is it just T-T ?

Looks as if my only way out is to pay £50/month to AAISP .... what a nonsense this fragmentation of service between several suppliers with compartmentalised responsibilities is. !!