I see what you mean . Replacing "Online" though, and keeping the rest the same, covers both reader type.

How about that?

Adjusted the package feature point, but also updated the Q&A section at the bottom to include Fast Path for those who of a more technical nature.

Heh! I think my idea was best, but it's your site. You still haven't explicitly mentioned Fast Path though, and the people looking for it may think that means you do not offer it. Interleaving controls could just mean Interleaving depth.

Re "such as Interleaving, Latency and SNR (line noise) levels", I think "such as Fast Path, Interleaving, Ping times and Noise margin" would be both clear to non-techies and explicit for techies. You certainly have no control over SNR (line noise).

In reply to a post by RobertoS:

You certainly have no control over SNR (line noise).

To a degree your right, but target SNR is certainly controlable.

In reply to a post by RobertoS:

You still haven't explicitly mentioned Fast Path though

. Well I did mention it, but only on the local internal web server

Uploaded to the public space would have helped.

In reply to a post by aquiss:

In reply to a post by RobertoS:

You certainly have no control over SNR (line noise).

To a degree your right, but target SNR is certainly controlable.

[cough]
PM on it's way in a mo .

In reply to a post by aquiss:

In reply to a post by RobertoS:

You still haven't explicitly mentioned Fast Path though

. Well I did mention it, but only on the local internal web server

Uploaded to the public space would have helped.