General Discussion
  >> Which ISP?


Register (or login) on our website and you will not see this ad.


Pages in this thread: 1 | 2 | 3 | [4] | (show all)   Print Thread
Standard User deleted
(deleted) Fri 18-Sep-15 12:05:18
Print Post

Re: non-LLU fibre: better ISP than Sky/BT for small extra c


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by ZenUserJP:
From what I see lately no broadband is better than what they are supplying. Others have migrated away and noticed an near instant upgrade in their QoS!
Rubbish, whilst there are undoubtedly some that have had problems with Plusnet there are many such as myself who are experiencing no problems at all. As for yourself, what recent experience do you have of Plusnet? I suspect very little.
Standard User RobertoS
(elder) Fri 18-Sep-15 12:05:44
Print Post

Re: non-LLU fibre: better ISP than Sky/BT for small extra c


[re: binary] [link to this post]
 
Amusingly, although I think we know what ZenUser is meaning, what his post actually says is that Plusnet supply the best broadband.

The indispensable man or woman passes from the scene, and what happens next is more or less the same thing as was happening before.
My broadband basic info/help site - www.robertos.me.uk. Domains, site and mail hosting - Tsohost.
Connection - AAISP Home::1 80/20. Sync 59999/14372kbps @ 600m. - BQM
Standard User deleted
(deleted) Sat 19-Sep-15 13:12:10
Print Post

Re: non-LLU fibre: better ISP than Sky/BT for small extra c


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by MCM:
In reply to a post by ZenUserJP:
As for yourself, what recent experience do you have of Plusnet? I suspect very little.


You suspect wrong. But that's none of your business either.


Register (or login) on our website and you will not see this ad.

Standard User deleted
(deleted) Sat 19-Sep-15 13:13:16
Print Post

Re: non-LLU fibre: better ISP than Sky/BT for small extra c


[re: RobertoS] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by RobertoS:
Amusingly, although I think we know what ZenUser is meaning, what his post actually says is that Plusnet supply the best broadband.


Maybe to you - but not to me? No broadband is better than the [censored] they supply. And people migrate AWAY from PN and notice an improvement with their new provider

So which part of that says they do?

Am I just being fickle?
Standard User deleted
(deleted) Sat 19-Sep-15 13:36:57
Print Post

Re: non-LLU fibre: better ISP than Sky/BT for small extra c


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
You suspect wrong. But that's none of your business either.
So that's a no then and just another clueless reply from someone whose posts should be ignored as worthless and who contributes little or nothing to these forums.
Standard User RobertoS
(elder) Sat 19-Sep-15 15:38:47
Print Post

Re: non-LLU fibre: better ISP than Sky/BT for small extra c


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
No petrol is better than Shell.
No runner is better than Bolt.
No airliner is faster than Concorde.
No broadband is better than Zen broadband.

The indispensable man or woman passes from the scene, and what happens next is more or less the same thing as was happening before.
My broadband basic info/help site - www.robertos.me.uk. Domains, site and mail hosting - Tsohost.
Connection - AAISP Home::1 80/20. Sync 59999/14372kbps @ 600m. - BQM

Edited by RobertoS (Sat 19-Sep-15 15:40:31)

Pages in this thread: 1 | 2 | 3 | [4] | (show all)   Print Thread

Jump to