Technical Discussion
  >> Windows Issues


Register (or login) on our website and you will not see this ad.


Pages in this thread: 1 | [2] | 3 | (show all)   Print Thread
Standard User deleted
(deleted) Tue 29-Apr-14 21:44:00
Print Post

Re: Firefox 29


[re: camieabz] [link to this post]
 
Need to keep up!
Standard User micksharpe
(eat-sleep-adslguide) Tue 29-Apr-14 22:50:26
Print Post

Re: Firefox 29


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
That's enough of that. mad

Now using Pale Moon. If the extensions I use work, I won't be going back.

'Sir, please,' she said... 'Will you not share your wisdom with us?'
'I have no wisdom,' he told her.
'Your experiences, then?'
'They have been trivial, uninteresting, and full of error.'
Ian M. Banks - Feersum Endjinn
Standard User Chrysalis
(legend) Wed 30-Apr-14 03:08:01
Print Post

Re: Firefox 29


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
I dont know other then to have influence on software development.

reading the bug reporting section on mozilla's site shows some very interesting things how decisions get made.

e.g. when the ability to disable keepalive was removed someone started a new bug, reported stating removing this and that line from the code base because non persistent connections are bad for the internet, within 2 weeks his changes were in a stable version of firefox. He wasnt questioned, there was effectively no testing, it was a fast tracked feature cut to match with chrome. This guy clearly had influence, as there has been numerous bug reports since started by end users asking for the feature to be reinstated met with resistance from him and others from within mozilla. So they not listening to end users, the direction is coming from elsewhere.

Also sometimes discussions among developers indicate they have managers to answer to.

Edited by Chrysalis (Wed 30-Apr-14 03:35:04)


Register (or login) on our website and you will not see this ad.

Standard User Chrysalis
(legend) Wed 30-Apr-14 03:22:32
Print Post

Re: Firefox 29


[re: Banger] [link to this post]
 
here is my probable future browser after ESR expires, it is using a firefox code base so addons work with it. The dev is commited to the older UI.

http://www.palemoon.org/layout-differences.shtml

Standard User micksharpe
(eat-sleep-adslguide) Wed 30-Apr-14 09:50:41
Print Post

Re: Firefox 29


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by MrTAToad2:
Why on earth would Google want to sponsor the Mozilla Foundation !?
My guess is that they want to encourage remaining Firefox users to switch to their Chrome browser (and ultimately to their Chrome OS). To do this, they must make Firefox look and behave as much like Chrome as possible. Once they have done this, they can then shut down Firefox (or halt development as they have already done with the Thunderbird e-mail client). Their goal is to grab as much of the cloud-based thin-client (handset and tablet) world-wide market as they can. Remember that they own both the Android and Chrome operating systems.

The real prize is users' data. Google want to have as much of the world population's data on their data centres as possible where they can sift it and analyse it to their heart's content. They have already stated quite blatantly that are analysing users' G-mail messages for commercial purposes and will continue to do so. Microsoft and Apple are also going after the cloud-based thin-client market segment although Microsoft has been slow getting off the starting block. Both companies are probably too ethical to monetize their users' data but they will quite happily make it available to the NSA.

China is desperately playing catch-up so that their own people's data doesn't reside on data centres in the USA. I am not sure what Russia is doing but it will need to be something similar if they don't want to lose their own people's data in the same way. India and the Arab states also need to wake up and smell the coffee.

'Sir, please,' she said... 'Will you not share your wisdom with us?'
'I have no wisdom,' he told her.
'Your experiences, then?'
'They have been trivial, uninteresting, and full of error.'
Ian M. Banks - Feersum Endjinn

Edited by micksharpe (Wed 30-Apr-14 17:46:24)

Standard User deleted
(deleted) Wed 30-Apr-14 10:27:47
Print Post

Re: Firefox 29


[re: micksharpe] [link to this post]
 
Been using the 64 bit for a while.

All my 40 extensions work fine.
Standard User micksharpe
(eat-sleep-adslguide) Wed 30-Apr-14 10:54:57
Print Post

Re: Firefox 29


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
Only problem so far is that Java applets are disabled and I can't find out how to enable them.

'Sir, please,' she said... 'Will you not share your wisdom with us?'
'I have no wisdom,' he told her.
'Your experiences, then?'
'They have been trivial, uninteresting, and full of error.'
Ian M. Banks - Feersum Endjinn
Standard User deleted
(deleted) Wed 30-Apr-14 13:12:05
Print Post

Re: Firefox 29


[re: micksharpe] [link to this post]
 
Java works for me on FF 29.
Standard User micksharpe
(eat-sleep-adslguide) Wed 30-Apr-14 13:45:20
Print Post

Re: Firefox 29


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by BatBoy:
Java works for me on FF 29.
Also for me but not on PM.

'Sir, please,' she said... 'Will you not share your wisdom with us?'
'I have no wisdom,' he told her.
'Your experiences, then?'
'They have been trivial, uninteresting, and full of error.'
Ian M. Banks - Feersum Endjinn
Standard User camieabz
(sensei) Wed 30-Apr-14 17:07:37
Print Post

Re: Firefox 29


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
Why?

If it works, it works.
Pages in this thread: 1 | [2] | 3 | (show all)   Print Thread

Jump to