User comments on ISPs
  >> Zen Internet


Register (or login) on our website and you will not see this ad.


These posts have been archived and can no longer be replied to or modified.
Pages in this thread: 1 | 2 | (show all)   Print Thread
Standard User mal76
(learned) Mon 16-Jul-07 15:34:59
Print Post

To NAT or not


[link to this post]
 
Hello All.,
I am this week, migrating to ZEN from Nildram. I have Speedtouch 510v4 router. Can someone please advise me whether it is best to set up with NAT configured or not?
Thanks for any replies.
mal
Standard User Sandgrounder
(knowledge is power) Mon 16-Jul-07 16:43:59
Print Post

Re: To NAT or not


[re: mal76] [link to this post]
 
You will no doubt receive advice suggesting both options are best. (because there are pros and cons to each).

My preference is to use the security provided by choosing NAT and then forward any ports which you may need to any servers you may have. You can then have as many machines on you LAN as you like - and setting it all up is easy.

Line One:- Zen Home 500 - DrayTek Vigor 2600VG
Line Two:- Nildram - DrayTek Vigor 2600
Standard User mal76
(learned) Mon 16-Jul-07 16:53:55
Print Post

Re: To NAT or not


[re: Sandgrounder] [link to this post]
 
Sandgrounder,
thanks for your reply. I only have one computer connected and don't know about port forwarding. When I look at my router info. it says there are no NAPT entries.
Do you still think it necessary with one PC.
thanks,
mal


Register (or login) on our website and you will not see this ad.

Standard User Pipexer
(knowledge is power) Mon 16-Jul-07 17:45:45
Print Post

Re: To NAT or not


[re: mal76] [link to this post]
 
If you play online games, then NAT is a no-no really as you will need so many ports forwarding it would be just easier to disable it. If you simply browse online sites/check email, then NAT would be a wise option.

I hope that helps a little


P I P E X 1024kbps
Standard User jinx3d
(member) Mon 16-Jul-07 17:53:55
Print Post

Re: To NAT or not


[re: Pipexer] [link to this post]
 
only if your serving the games will you need to forward anything..
simply playing on other servers you wont need to forward anything

ZeN Office 8000 MAX
Standard User Pipexer
(knowledge is power) Mon 16-Jul-07 17:55:16
Print Post

Re: To NAT or not


[re: jinx3d] [link to this post]
 
I have found some/many games will play up without NAT even if you are only playing them...


P I P E X 1024kbps
Standard User mal76
(learned) Mon 16-Jul-07 18:21:43
Print Post

Re: To NAT or not


[re: Pipexer] [link to this post]
 
I only browse and check emails really.No online gaming.
Seems in those circumstances NAT is favoured.
Thanks to you all for the advice.
mal.
Standard User BlankFrank
(knowledge is power) Mon 16-Jul-07 18:38:14
Print Post

Re: To NAT or not


[re: Pipexer] [link to this post]
 
I game a lot and none of the games I play have a problem with NAT. Either you play games I haven't come across or your router is not doing NAT properly.

Standard User simonblack
(member) Mon 16-Jul-07 18:39:49
Print Post

Re: To NAT or not


[re: mal76] [link to this post]
 
I've often wondered if there are any QoS issues using 1 IP vs 8, i.e. will the incoming bandwidth be split equally between the 8 IP or is it just first come first served.
Standard User Pipexer
(knowledge is power) Mon 16-Jul-07 18:52:35
Print Post

Re: To NAT or not


[re: BlankFrank] [link to this post]
 
Probably more the fact I play old games ;-)


P I P E X 1024kbps
Pages in this thread: 1 | 2 | (show all)   Print Thread

Jump to