I guess no-one knows what the real solution is - pay based on bandwidth , pay based on data transfer.
To which needs to be added the cost of installing and maintaining the infrastructure which is essentially the same regardless of bandwidth or quantity of data transferred. To confuse matters there is line rental which contributes towards the Cu costs, buildings, etc. and paid regardless of whether the end user has or uses FTTC.
EDIT: Not that I am suggesting that this or Andrew's suggestion be adopted. Instead I was trying to bring attention to the fact that many users feel aggrieved that they don't get what they want or expect, pay more than someone else or receive less than someone else. Such is life and society and this needs to be understood and accepted.
Edited by deleted (Sat 12-Sep-15 19:25:49)