User comments on ISPs
  >> Zen Internet


Register (or login) on our website and you will not see this ad.


Pages in this thread: 1 | 2 | [3] | 4 | 5 | (show all)   Print Thread
Standard User Jax2
(member) Thu 11-Feb-16 16:20:16
Print Post

Re: IPv6 dhcp6c /48 prefix broken


[re: Jax2] [link to this post]
 
Further Update.

Zen have done their stuff. However oddly the Thinkbroadband "Test your IPv6 Readiness Test" tells me my ISPS server does not have access to IPv6. If I run the tests on Jason Feslers site which the Thinkbroadbands test is based on it shows is no such problem and tells me my ISPS server does have IPv6 access. I wonder which is right, in other words are things running as they should or not?
Standard User deleted
(deleted) Thu 11-Feb-16 19:57:27
Print Post

Re: IPv6 dhcp6c /48 prefix broken


[re: Jax2] [link to this post]
 
I get the same thing. I believe TBB is at fault.

Strangely enough, I experienced this exact same issue back in May 2014. I had to go hunting in my Gmail to locate the email I sent to John, who subsequently fixed this problem.

For the record, here is what I sent (I've also now reminded myself how I diagnosed this issue!):

Query regarding IPv6 Readiness Test

I was with Andrews & Arnold running full IPv4 and native IPv6. When I was with them, I was able to run your IPv6 Readiness Test and score a full 10/10.

I have now switched to Zen Internet running a HE (Hurricane Electric) IPv6 tunnel.

On both setups, I run dnsmasq (broadband router is Linux CentOS) with this listening on both IPv4 and IPv6 local interfaces. But, I now only score 9/10 for the IPv6 Readiness Test - the part that is failing is:

Your DNS server (possibly run by your ISP) appears to have no access to the IPv6 Internet, or is not configured to use it. This may in the future restrict your ability to reach IPv6-only sites.

I have looked at what is happening at this part of the test and it seems it is trying to resolve A and AAAA records against ds.v6ns.v6test.thinkbroadband.com:

Text
1
23
4
12:25:54.809629 IP 192.168.0.130.44976 > 192.168.0.1.53: 59202+ A? ds.v6ns.v6test.thinkbroadband.com. (51)
12:25:54.809687 IP 192.168.0.130.9411 > 192.168.0.1.53: 34418+ AAAA? ds.v6ns.v6test.thinkbroadband.com. (51)12:25:54.810126 IP 192.168.0.1.53 > 192.168.0.130.44976: 59202 ServFail 0/0/0 (51)
12:25:54.810239 IP 192.168.0.1.53 > 192.168.0.130.9411: 34418 ServFail 0/0/0 (51)


Can you confirm if this is expected behaviour and how exactly this part of the test works? If it is the HE tunnel, I fail to see how this would affect the result of the test.


So, no surprise, I did some further testing just now using dig and it seems this issue has resurfaced.

Text
1
23
45
67
89
1011
1213
1415
1617
1819
2021
2223
2425
2627
2829
3031
$ dig -t A ds.v6ns.v6test.thinkbroadband.com
 ; <<>> DiG 9.8.3-P1 <<>> -t A ds.v6ns.v6test.thinkbroadband.com
;; global options: +cmd;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: SERVFAIL, id: 19089;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0
 ;; QUESTION SECTION:
;ds.v6ns.v6test.thinkbroadband.com. IN  A 
;; Query time: 20 msec;; SERVER: 192.168.0.1#53(192.168.0.1)
;; WHEN: Thu Feb 11 19:50:47 2016;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 51
 $ dig -t AAAA ds.v6ns.v6test.thinkbroadband.com
 ; <<>> DiG 9.8.3-P1 <<>> -t AAAA ds.v6ns.v6test.thinkbroadband.com
;; global options: +cmd;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: SERVFAIL, id: 16287;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0
 ;; QUESTION SECTION:
;ds.v6ns.v6test.thinkbroadband.com. IN  AAAA 
;; Query time: 14 msec;; SERVER: 192.168.0.1#53(192.168.0.1)
;; WHEN: Thu Feb 11 19:51:01 2016;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 51


Once John fixes these 2 records again, the test should be all green.
Standard User Jax2
(member) Thu 11-Feb-16 21:37:36
Print Post

Re: IPv6 dhcp6c /48 prefix broken


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
Thanks for that, very interesting. I must admit that I started to have my doubts when I realised that the other test gave different results.


Register (or login) on our website and you will not see this ad.

Standard User deleted
(deleted) Fri 12-Feb-16 12:17:16
Print Post

Re: IPv6 dhcp6c /48 prefix broken


[re: Jax2] [link to this post]
 
I contacted John again, pointing him to this thread, and he's now fixed the A and AAAA records.

Try again and all should be good.
Standard User Jax2
(member) Fri 12-Feb-16 17:49:38
Print Post

Re: IPv6 dhcp6c /48 prefix broken


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
Thanks again, all sorted and working fine now.
Standard User deleted
(deleted) Thu 18-Feb-16 12:42:19
Print Post

Re: IPv6 dhcp6c /48 prefix broken


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by hazey_flakes:
With regards to rDNS, again please email the request to the IPv6 team, they'll then get this set up for you. We are working on DNS and portal tools to support IPv6 but I cannot provide a commitment for when these will be available.

Seems you guys have finally set my rDNS up - thanks very much for doing this!

Final point of note - you really need to map some IPv6 addresses and glue-records against your name servers and with Nominet, because currently you're only serving IPv6 reverse DNS from IPv4-only enabled infrastructure.

Domain name:
    zen.co.uk

...

Name servers:
    ns0.zen.co.uk             212.23.8.1
    ns1.zen.co.uk             212.23.3.1
Standard User deleted
(deleted) Fri 19-Feb-16 15:13:53
Print Post

Re: IPv6 dhcp6c /48 prefix broken


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by mixt:
Final point of note - you really need to map some IPv6 addresses and glue-records against your name servers and with Nominet, because currently you're only serving IPv6 reverse DNS from IPv4-only enabled infrastructure.


A very good point! Brandon and I have just been having a chat with our Systems team, and we'll be working with them to get this resolved (pardon the pun!).

We'll also get Brandon an ISP tag sorted smile

Jon
Standard User deleted
(deleted) Thu 03-Mar-16 12:26:53
Print Post

Re: IPv6 dhcp6c /48 prefix broken


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
FYI, I have just gained knowledge from Zen technical support themselves that not all of Zen's gateways are IPv6 enabled. I rebooted my router yesterday and landed up on gateway dsl9 (normally I connect to dsl6) and, on that gateway, no link level IPv6 address is presented on the ppp interface, completely breaking IPv6 connectivity (this normally shows up as "inet6 addr: fe80::1/10 Scope:Link" upon running ifconfig).

I've updated my scripts to check for this eventuality moving forward, so if it looks like I have connected to a gateway which isn't presenting an IPv6 link level address, I bounce the ppp session and re-connect.

This issue remains outstanding with the IPv6 team - namely, if I'm IPv6 enabled, and not all their gateways support IPv6, why did I land up on a gateway which does not support it?

I have to say, in my opinion, becoming increasingly more reliant on IPv6 connectivity, this is hardly a confidence boost and the kind of level of service I expected from Zen, for the premium I'm paying. Effectively, your IPv6 service might as well be in beta still, given this finding. With A&A, I never experienced issues like this and it may sway me to return to them in May once my contract is up here, because I just didn't get these kind of problems with them.

Edited by deleted (Thu 03-Mar-16 12:28:21)

Standard User deleted
(deleted) Thu 03-Mar-16 18:39:42
Print Post

Re: IPv6 dhcp6c /48 prefix broken


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by mixt:
FYI, I have just gained knowledge from Zen technical support themselves that not all of Zen's gateways are IPv6 enabled. I rebooted my router yesterday and landed up on gateway dsl9 (normally I connect to dsl6) and, on that gateway, no link level IPv6 address is presented on the ppp interface, completely breaking IPv6 connectivity (this normally shows up as "inet6 addr: fe80::1/10 Scope:Link" upon running ifconfig).


This is what I was told too (normally on dsl6, but had to have IPv6 removed as part of the troubleshooting for the throughput issue)

I'm also interested to know why Zen haven't enabled all of their gateways (or at least enough to cope with demand, as being moved off of dsl6 helped improve my speeds a bit, though nothing close to expected performance). Perhaps they're not confident that all CPE will handle it?
Standard User deleted
(deleted) Sat 05-Mar-16 22:20:21
Print Post

Re: IPv6 dhcp6c /48 prefix broken


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
having the same issue, my ipv4 traffic is a bit of a hit and miss today, no issues on the status page will contact Zen tho
Pages in this thread: 1 | 2 | [3] | 4 | 5 | (show all)   Print Thread

Jump to