User comments on ISPs
  >> PlusNet plc


Register (or login) on our website and you will not see this ad.


Pages in this thread: 1 | 2 | 3 | [4] | (show all)   Print Thread
Standard User deleted
(deleted) Sun 24-Nov-13 10:34:53
Print Post

Re: Suggestions for upstrem QOS for Plusnet


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
oh i meant P2P meaning P2P gaming not P2P bit torrent but i will remove DNS if its port 53

Edited by deleted (Sun 24-Nov-13 11:19:23)

Standard User deleted
(deleted) Tue 31-Dec-13 11:51:47
Print Post

Re: Suggestions for upstrem QOS for Plusnet


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
Post deleted by ffx2boy

Edited by deleted (Tue 31-Dec-13 14:49:42)

Standard User deleted
(deleted) Sun 09-Feb-14 11:05:31
Print Post

Re: Suggestions for upstrem QOS for Plusnet


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
I have done few tests showing the performance difference between queue 4 (management) and queue 5 on the TG852n. It showed that using queue 5 rather than 4 gives a more smoother QOS experience. Depending on the traffic it could give about half the ping time e.g. I would sometimes see 100 ms on queue 4 but only 50 ms on queue 5 when the upstream was being maxing out. (Bit torrent traffic was most noticeable for doing this)
You should be able to change my QOS rules Which run in queue 4 to queue 5 if you wish to improve the upstream QOS for your gaming traffic. You should be able to do this by the use of the following:

label add name=Game

label modify name=Game classification=overwrite defclass=14 ackclass=14
bidirectional=disabled inheritance=disabled

label rule modify chain=qos_user_labels index=1 label=Game

saveall

Edited by deleted (Sun 09-Feb-14 21:03:50)


Register (or login) on our website and you will not see this ad.

Pages in this thread: 1 | 2 | 3 | [4] | (show all)   Print Thread

Jump to