User comments on ISPs
  >> PlusNet plc


Register (or login) on our website and you will not see this ad.


Pages in this thread: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | [17] | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | (show all)   Print Thread
Standard User RobertoS
(elder) Mon 13-Apr-15 21:14:34
Print Post

Re: Plusnet in meltdown?


[re: jchamier] [link to this post]
 
That's another thing smile. No way do I want to install a preview - the instruction list for moving to the pukka release of such from MS used to run to over a page.

My broadband basic info/help site - www.robertos.me.uk. Domains, site and mail hosting - Tsohost.
Connection - Plusnet UnLim Fibre (FTTC). Sync 60000/16961kbps @ 600m. - IPv4BQM IPv6BQM
Standard User kasg
(fountain of knowledge) Mon 13-Apr-15 21:26:10
Print Post

Re: Plusnet in meltdown?


[re: RobertoS] [link to this post]
 
I have installed the Windows 10 preview in a VM on my main PC and as the only OS (upgraded in-place from 8.1) on a spare laptop and had no problems at all. I am led to believe that the upgrade from the preview to the full release will this time be relatively painless.

Kevin

plusnet Unlimited Fibre - sync approx 67000/20000 at 450m - BQM
Using OpenDNS
Domains and web hosting with TSOHOST
Standard User jchamier
(eat-sleep-adslguide) Mon 13-Apr-15 22:29:22
Print Post

Re: Plusnet in meltdown?


[re: RobertoS] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by RobertoS:
That's another thing smile. No way do I want to install a preview - the instruction list for moving to the pukka release of such from MS used to run to over a page.


Try the server OSes ! No, I run in a VMware virtual machine on my Mac smile

plusnet unlimited fibre - 2 Jun 14 - 470m - 80/20 - Summer/dry sync 55/9.4, Winter/wet sync 52/9.1
15 years broadband (1999 ntl:cable trial) - Asus RT-AC68U with HG612 - BQM - Summer PN speed - Winter PN speed


Register (or login) on our website and you will not see this ad.

Standard User broadband66
(fountain of knowledge) Tue 14-Apr-15 10:12:11
Print Post

Re: Plusnet in meltdown?


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
Take National Speed limit sign. The information is different for different types of road.

Sometimes YOU have to look for the info' and not rely on others to hold your hand and explain every little nuance.

Was Eclipse Home Option 1, VM 2Mb & O2 Standard
Now Utility Warehouse (up to 16mbps) via Talk Talk

Edited by broadband66 (Tue 14-Apr-15 10:14:46)

Standard User deleted
(deleted) Tue 14-Apr-15 10:58:18
Print Post

Re: Plusnet in meltdown?


[re: broadband66] [link to this post]
 
And you get instructions about such things and w hat to look for BEFORE being given the chance to look for yourself. Or did you not have instruction and you are driving without a license?
Standard User deleted
(deleted) Tue 14-Apr-15 16:39:34
Print Post

Re: Plusnet in meltdown?


[re: broadband66] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by broadband66:
The charge for an internal fault is surely common knowledge?

From a legal perspective, what matters are the terms of the contract between the service provider and the consumer.

There are certain terms implied into a contract by statute - the fairly well known consumer rights created by the Sale of Goods Act 1979 and Supply of Goods and Services Act 1982 fall into this category.

Terms can be implied in certain other circumstances, but these are relatively narrow. There are four scenarios that come to mind:
  1. when the term is customary in a certain locality or trade
  2. when the term is a consistent part of dealings between the parties
  3. when the meaning of a contract is unclear to an observer, but the parties were in agreement over what was intended at the time of contract formation
  4. when the contract is silent over necessary customary terms

Scenario 1 is concerned with common knowledge, but really only covers matters that are so well known within the locality or trade in question that there should be little doubt in the minds of both parties that the term is incorporated even in the absence of an explicit term covering the matter.

It is hard to see how scenario 2 could apply to a residential ISP, as few consumers will take out enough contracts in a year to be regarded as consistent dealings.

Scenario 3 doesn't apply here, as it would be impossible to show the customer agreed to visit charges in 'no fault found' scenarios if the contract was silent on the matter. The case law here is clear that this scenario is only about resolving disputes about the meaning of the contract as it stands, and it is not possible to improve upon the contract (so the ISP couldn't use this scenario to argue 'we left out mention of visit charges, but the customer should have known they would be levied in some scenarios').

Scenario 4 doesn't apply here, as there is nothing necessary about passing on a visit charge. The case law here relates to a landlord arguing they had no responsibility to make reasonable efforts to maintain the stairs, lifts and rubbish chutes in a block of flats. The court held that an easement to use the stairs, lifts and rubbish chutes was necessary for the tenant to use their flat, so the landlord had a contractual repair obligation over these necessary areas.


I would expect that the only legally enforceable way a residential ISP could pass on a visit charge is via an explicit contractual term - either in the contract to provide service, or a contract relating to the visit (for example, if the customer agreed to the visit on the basis that a charge would be levied if no fault is found). A contract can be formed verbally, though the party attempting to rely on that contract would have to be able to demonstrate a contract more likely than not existed, for example by producing a recording of a telephone call.

To my mind, an ISP saying on the phone "We can send an engineer, but if the engineer reports no fault is found, or the only faults are on your internal wiring, we will charge you £150. Do you agree?" and the customer responding "Yes" forms a valid contract that allows the visit charge to be passed on.
Standard User broadband66
(fountain of knowledge) Wed 15-Apr-15 15:55:56
Print Post

Re: Plusnet in meltdown?


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
And what is the national speed limit on a dual carriageway with one lane?

Was Eclipse Home Option 1, VM 2Mb & O2 Standard
Now Utility Warehouse (up to 16mbps) via Talk Talk
Standard User ian72
(eat-sleep-adslguide) Wed 15-Apr-15 15:59:00
Print Post

Re: Plusnet in meltdown?


[re: broadband66] [link to this post]
 
Assuming there is no central reservation then I assume it is half the speed limit of a dual carriageway with 2 lanes - so must be 30. If there is a central reservation then 35.
Standard User broadband66
(fountain of knowledge) Wed 15-Apr-15 16:05:08
Print Post

Re: Plusnet in meltdown?


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
When agreeing to a telephone line with BT you are allowed to install an extension to that master socket.

If the phone on the extension stopped working, due to a fault in the extension, I wouldn't expect BT to fix my work free of charge.

Was Eclipse Home Option 1, VM 2Mb & O2 Standard
Now Utility Warehouse (up to 16mbps) via Talk Talk
Standard User broadband66
(fountain of knowledge) Wed 15-Apr-15 16:10:06
Print Post

Re: Plusnet in meltdown?


[re: ian72] [link to this post]
 
As a clue. A dual carriageway is a dual carriageway whether 1 or 2 lanes either side.

Was Eclipse Home Option 1, VM 2Mb & O2 Standard
Now Utility Warehouse (up to 16mbps) via Talk Talk
Pages in this thread: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | [17] | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | (show all)   Print Thread

Jump to