General Discussion
  >> Fibre Broadband


Register (or login) on our website and you will not see this ad.


Pages in this thread: 1 | 2 | [3] | (show all)   Print Thread
Standard User shrimper1
(member) Fri 23-Dec-11 13:51:45
Print Post

Re: why are BT so useless


[re: RobertoS] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by RobertoS:
In reply to a post by Anonymous:
Europe and the rest of the world have had much better broadband for years.
Many cities in the rest of the world do indeed, but the vast majority of other countries have a much lower coverage of the population with an acceptable service.

You are looking at selective statistics. Anything can be proved by statistics, even complete opposites.


Absolutely correct! it's called managing statistics wink

However on another more positive note, I'm still really pleased with the consistently higher speeds I'm getting from BT, and it proves the old saying .......... you get what you pay for smile
Glad that I did not go to BT for their forum - it's something else frown
as only one man/woman and his or her dog appears to be using it ............. what a waste of Corporate £millions!
Anonymous
(Unregistered)Fri 23-Dec-11 13:59:27
Print Post

Re: why are BT so useless


[re: shrimper1] [link to this post]
 
although it could be then seen as a god company to go with as the forums aren't abuzz with complaints.

Although there do seem to be die hard BT haters who go there for a rant.
Standard User TheManStan
(learned) Fri 23-Dec-11 14:01:32
Print Post

Re: why are BT so useless


[re: MHC] [link to this post]
 
Yes, you're right. Split off and shares given to BT shareholders, who got the £18billion from Telefonica when they bought it...


Register (or login) on our website and you will not see this ad.

Standard User MHC
(legend) Fri 23-Dec-11 14:42:28
Print Post

Re: why are BT so useless


[re: TheManStan] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by TheManStan:
Yes, you're right. Split off and shares given to BT shareholders, who got the £18billion from Telefonica when they bought it...


Shareholders were not GIVEN any shares. What they received in exchange for BT shares were shares of an equal and equivalent value in te two companies.

Go back and look at how many BILLIONS BT share holders paid for the shares, how much they then paid in rights issues over the years. the shareholders return on investment over the past 10 or 20 years has probably been around te same as an investment in a bank/buildiong society savings account.





~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


M H C


taurus excreta cerebrum vincit
Standard User TheManStan
(learned) Fri 23-Dec-11 15:34:38
Print Post

Re: why are BT so useless


[re: MHC] [link to this post]
 
Sorry you don't seem to understand that i agreed with you...

Yes, in the split shares were issued to BT shareholders for equivalent value in the two companies. Surrendering the original BT shares and being GIVEN two sets of new notes, one for new BT shares and one for O2 shares. I wasn't impying they magicked up cash for nothing... or are you just nit picking for nit picking's sake?

Those shareholders who kept the O2 shares, then received ~£18 billion from Telefonica when they were taken over. Original note value ~82.75p received 200p...
Pages in this thread: 1 | 2 | [3] | (show all)   Print Thread

Jump to