In reply to a
post by Anonymous:
http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8319/79764
32771_8b59e1441d_o.png
My SNR has always been low which suits me as prior to cutting the power off yesterday and rebooting the modem my uptime is usually weeks and although in the past my voice calls have been a bit 'hissy' (voice calls are something I very rarely use anyway) they seem to have cleared up now and my DSL is always rock solid.
I remember back in my Plusnet days I had to fight with tech support to get a target SNR of 9.0 - when they found out I was using software to lower it (albeit to a limited amount) they informed me I was breaking the law and not to ask for any support again otherwise they would phone the police and have me arrested for hacking.
.... I nearly [censored] myself with laughter .....
Anyway since being with Sky my SNR has always had a target of 6.0 but frequently wanders below that - as I said the only thing to have changed is my attenuation and I cannot understand how the hell an increase could ultimately result in a better service.
Illegal?

oh dear.
The problem with changing a SNR on most networks, certainly with Bt is that it confuses the hell out of their line management system. with Cable and wireless they did not have anything like that, so if I put my SNR down to 1 it would stay at 1, ok so it would no doubt disconnect a lot, but ti would stay there.
Come to think of it i put my SNR down to 4 and it stayed connected for weeks.
Plusnet is another BT clone that uses the same system, but traffic manage like hell, which is why when they took over Metronet I jumped ship as fast as I could , even if it was to AOL, which was not owned by Talk Talk at the time.
Now Plusnet is BT.
Adrian
Desktop machine now powered by windows 7 pro 64bit , laptop by ubuntu
ALLPAY Wireless broadband