General Discussion
  >> Fibre Broadband


Register (or login) on our website and you will not see this ad.


Pages in this thread: 1 | [2] | 3 | (show all)   Print Thread
Standard User deleted
(deleted) Sun 13-Apr-14 17:06:12
Print Post

Re: ECI vs HG612


[re: JB68] [link to this post]
 
cheers - thought I'd have a look..

I was hoping to see if the line would support more for the future.
anyway I can find out what the max the line could support ?
Standard User MHC
(sensei) Sun 13-Apr-14 17:23:33
Print Post

Re: ECI vs HG612


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by MrPete:
cheers - thought I'd have a look..

I was hoping to see if the line would support more for the future.
anyway I can find out what the max the line could support ?


The info is there - line 6 MAX Upstream and Downstream You have some headroom on upstream but downstream is maxed out on VDSL2 17A.

If Vectoring comes about you might get more, but no guarantees and if BT moved to a 30MHz bandwidth you might again get a little more.


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

M H C


taurus excreta cerebrum vincit
Standard User think26872
(committed) Sun 13-Apr-14 18:08:53
Print Post

Re: ECI vs HG612


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
Could you post approx how far away from the cabinet you are using the measuring tool on Google Maps or similar? Thanks


Register (or login) on our website and you will not see this ad.

Standard User deleted
(deleted) Sun 13-Apr-14 21:54:03
Print Post

Re: ECI vs HG612


[re: think26872] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by think26872:
Could you post approx how far away from the cabinet you are using the measuring tool on Google Maps or similar? Thanks


Approx 250 - 300 mtrs depending which route they ran the phone line..
Was there a specific reason to know ?

Regards
Standard User burakkucat
(experienced) Mon 14-Apr-14 13:39:08
Print Post

Re: ECI vs HG612


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by MrPete:
Any way to find out what's in the cabinet ?
Certainly. wink

xdslcmd info --vendor

If the output shows an Infineon chipset is in use, it is an ECI MSAN/DSLAM whereas it the output shows a Broadcom chipset is in use, it is a Huawei MSAN/DSLAM.

100% Linux and, previously, Unix.
Standard User lockyatlrg
(fountain of knowledge) Mon 14-Apr-14 14:17:59
Print Post

Re: ECI vs HG612


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
The ECI is 1 - 2 ms faster than the HG612.

BT Infinity
ROUTER:-Netgear WNDR37AV
JDSU Stats
Attainable 105977D 38659U
Sync 79999D 20000U
Attenuation: 5.4 SNR: Down 13.1 Up 24.3
Line Length 160meters
Standard User RobertoS
(sensei) Mon 14-Apr-14 14:21:40
Print Post

Re: ECI vs HG612


[re: burakkucat] [link to this post]
 
Or, if you haven't an unlocked modem (I know he has), look at the cabinet tongue smile.

My broadband basic info/help site - www.robertos.me.uk | Domains,site and mail hosting - Tsohost.
Connection - Plusnet UnLim Fibre (FTTC). Sync ~ 58.7/14.6Mbps @ 600m. - BQM

"Where talent is a dwarf, self-esteem is a giant." - Jean-Antoine Petit-Senn.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Allergy information: This post was manufactured in an environment where nuts are present. It may include traces of understatement, litotes and humour.
Standard User burakkucat
(experienced) Mon 14-Apr-14 14:40:51
Print Post

Re: ECI vs HG612


[re: RobertoS] [link to this post]
 
tongue wink

100% Linux and, previously, Unix.
Standard User deleted
(deleted) Mon 14-Apr-14 14:45:00
Print Post

Re: ECI vs HG612


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
The statistics look fine, but the modem hadn't been connected for very long. That makes it hard to tell whether you suffer from many errors: just that you haven't for the 30 minutes.

DLM has not requested intervention (INP and "delay" are both zero, both downstream and upstream). Your modem isn't using any error correction or interleaving downstream, but it has elected to make use of error correction upstream (R=16, N=255) with interleaving off (I=0). Mine does this too, with similar settings; I suspect that it chooses to use a little of the spare bandwidth upstream: A max attainable of 26Mbps vs the top package speed of 20Mbps gives plenty of room for this minimal level of FEC (which is 6%, or around 1.2Mbps).

Your attenuation level is slightly lower than mine, suggesting that you have a slightly shorter line (mine is 16.4dB), but you get slightly lower speeds (mine is 80Mbps with a maximum attainable of 82Mbps). I guess you suffer from slightly more crosstalk than my line.

As for errors: you only had one in the 30 minutes, so is pretty low - especially if it keeps that up day-in and day-out.

My line achieves this:
ES:             47709           9520
SES:            663             0
UAS:            59              46
AS:             4942742

and
Total time = 1 days 11 hours 36 min 23 sec
(This time is wrong)
FEC:            0               149628
CRC:            472793          12191
ES:             47709           9520
SES:            663             0
UAS:            59              46
LOS:            1               0
LOF:            13              0
LOM:            2               0

That shows that my uptime is 4,942,742s (or 57.2 days). That means I'm running at about 8,000 CRC's per day (near 350 per hour), and about 800 ES's per day - without DLM intervention. I think it is mainly the ES and SES rates that DLM monitors.

Edited by deleted (Mon 14-Apr-14 16:08:09)

Standard User deleted
(deleted) Mon 14-Apr-14 16:19:04
Print Post

Re: ECI vs HG612


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
Thanks for the replies and advice on my stats.

This is how it's looking 24 hours in:

Text
1
23
45
67
89
1011
1213
1415
1617
1819
2021
2223
2425
2627
2829
3031
3233
3435
3637
3839
4041
4243
4445
4647
4849
5051
5253
5455
5657
5859
6061
6263
6465
6667
6869
7071
7273
7475
7677
7879
8081
8283
8485
8687
8889
9091
9293
9495
9697
9899
100101
102103
104105
106107
108109
110111
112113
114115
116117
118
# xdslcmd info --stats
xdslcmd: ADSL driver and PHY statusStatus: Showtime
Retrain Reason: 0Last initialization procedure status:   0
Max:    Upstream rate = 26381 Kbps, Downstream rate = 76936 KbpsBearer: 0, Upstream rate = 20000 Kbps, Downstream rate = 78364 Kbps
 Link Power State:       L0
Mode:                   VDSL2 Annex BVDSL2 Profile:          Profile 17a
TPS-TC:                 PTM Mode(0x0)Trellis:                U:ON /D:ON
Line Status:            No DefectTraining Status:        Showtime
                Down            UpSNR (dB):        5.9             9.5
Attn(dB):        13.3            0.0Pwr(dBm):        13.8            2.1
                        VDSL2 framing                        Bearer 0
MSGc:           18              150B:              239             236
M:              1               1T:              23              5
R:              0               16S:              0.0975          0.3771
L:              19696           5410D:              1               1
I:              240             255N:              240             255
                        Counters                        Bearer 0
OHF:            54809222                1410500OHFErr:         115             95
RS:             0               2164321RSCorr:         0               703
RSUnCorr:       0               0 
                        Bearer 0HEC:            206             0
OCD:            4               0LCD:            4               0
Total Cells:    1052160345              0Data Cells:     213293155               0
Drop Cells:     0Bit Errors:     0               0
 ES:             100             94
SES:            0               0UAS:            26              26
AS:             92525 
                        Bearer 0INP:            0.00            0.00
INPRein:        0.00            0.00delay:          0               0
PER:            1.68            6.15OR:             113.73          202.87
AgR:            78477.44        20203.27 
Bitswap:        57785/57785             696/703 
Total time = 1 days 1 hours 42 min 31 secFEC:            0               703
CRC:            115             95ES:             100             94
SES:            0               0UAS:            26              26
LOS:            0               0LOF:            0               0
LOM:            0               0Latest 15 minutes time = 12 min 31 sec
FEC:            0               3CRC:            3               1
ES:             2               1SES:            0               0
UAS:            0               0LOS:            0               0
LOF:            0               0LOM:            0               0
Previous 15 minutes time = 15 min 0 secFEC:            0               13
CRC:            2               1ES:             2               1
SES:            0               0UAS:            0               0
LOS:            0               0LOF:            0               0
LOM:            0               0Latest 1 day time = 1 hours 42 min 31 sec
FEC:            0               48CRC:            9               8
ES:             8               8SES:            0               0
UAS:            0               0LOS:            0               0
LOF:            0               0LOM:            0               0
Previous 1 day time = 24 hours 0 secFEC:            0               655
CRC:            106             87ES:             92              86
SES:            0               0UAS:            26              26
LOS:            0               0LOF:            0               0
LOM:            0               0Since Link time = 1 days 1 hours 42 min 5 sec
FEC:            0               703CRC:            115             95
ES:             100             94SES:            0               0
UAS:            0               0LOS:            0               0
LOF:            0               0LOM:            0               0
#


As far as I know there have been no reboots !
Pages in this thread: 1 | [2] | 3 | (show all)   Print Thread

Jump to