I think you can rely on Ribble's information being more detailed than Sky's.
What they are calling faulty equipment may well be the original problem. If the replacement sent were incorrect as Ribble says, all Sky would see would be a slippage of the fix date.
Even if the original was the incorrect item, similar logic applies.
Many years ago I knew a man who had a brand new 4.2 litre Jaguar XJ6. After a fairly short time the gearbox failed. So did the replacement. And the third one.
The fourth time, instead of taking it back to the dealer he took it to an independent Jaguar specialist, who diagnosed it quite quickly.
The car had been built at a time when Jaguar were having all sorts of problems. When the time came on the assembly line for the gearbox to be fitted, what arrived was the one for the 3.2 litre engine. It just couldn't cope with the torque.
The dealer had been ordering replacements based on the part number on the gearbox, not from the catalogue. The specialist ordered the correct gearbox and all was well.
The indispensable man or woman passes from the scene, and what happens next is more or less the same thing as was happening before.
My broadband basic info/help site -
www.robertos.me.uk. Domains, site and mail hosting -
Tsohost.
Connection - AAISP Home::1 80/20. Sync 59997/15142kbps @ 600m. -
BQM