I even posted this review of the HG633 but they said it was not a good review, i have been testing most of the day and have re-named 2.4 and 5 GHz SSID so i can connect to either as advised so i can connect to the fastest and still cannot get above 21 Mbps, i have asked for a new router to test.
By Edward ChesterApril 5, 2017.
In addition, it becomes evident the Wi-Fi tech used here is fairly basic, despite its use of dual-band (5GHz and 2.4GHz) and the latest AC Wi-Fi standard. In tests this router came a distant last, although I reiterate that some other ISP-provided routers will perform just as poorly.
Using the 5GHz band, this router maxed out at just 21.3MB/sec, which compares to 60.1MB/sec for the next slowest AC router I�ve tested. In our two further tests the router managed 9.3MB/sec (5m away, with two walls between the router and the Wi-Fi receiver) and 9.6MB/sec (7m away, with two walls in between and a floor down). Again, these figures are dwarfed by the next worst on test, which managed 37.8MB/sec and 13.5MB/sec.
Moving to the generally slower 2.4GHz band and the difference is more modest, as even the fastest routers can only hit around 20MB/sec. Nonetheless, the HG633 managed only 7.6MB/sec, 6.2MB/sec and 4.7MB/sec; the next worst recorded 11.9MB/sec, 7.8MB/sec and 6.8MB/sec.
These figures pale even in comparison to other ISP-provided routers, with the likes of the BT Home Hub 5 hitting 50MB/sec+ in our AC tests. In fact, even the old TalkTalk Super Router, the HG635, performed reasonably well, so it�s clear just how inadequate the HG633 is. Moreover, if you go out and spend £50-£100 on a third-party router you�re likely to benefit from a huge leap in performance.
Read more at http://www.trustedreviews.com/reviews/talktalk-hg633...



Pages in this thread:
Print Thread
