Completely agree.
I have a pet theory that a series of repeated GEA FTTC tests, run very close together will often eventually produce a �potential HR� test result .... thus allowing CP CS to generate a non appointed fault.
This is borne out by VERY often seeing the HR test result on faults, but not being able to repeat it when running the same test on the same system later.
My money is on the OP�s visit returning �fault not found� *
* Or an outside bet might be a duff port on the DSLAM, though a hunch says not.
Edited by Zarjaz (Thu 21-Nov-19 07:15:32)