Technical Discussion
  >> Gaming Forum


Register (or login) on our website and you will not see this ad.


Pages in this thread: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | >> (show all)   Print Thread
Standard User deleted
(deleted) Tue 16-Aug-11 17:06:34
Print Post

And this is why you need 64 players.


[link to this post]
 
http://www.joystiq.com/2011/08/16/battlefield-3-mult...
Standard User deleted
(deleted) Tue 16-Aug-11 17:13:49
Print Post

Re: And this is why you need 64 players.


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
Damn, you beat me to it. I swear it wasn't there when I started my thread. x)

Now this is more like it. Looks much more like a Battlefield game.

YT link, if anyone wants it.

Edited by deleted (Tue 16-Aug-11 17:17:23)

Standard User deleted
(deleted) Tue 16-Aug-11 17:24:53
Print Post

Re: And this is why you need 64 players.


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
lol, i caught it on joystiq.

This is why 64 players is a must, helis covering the ground, jets patroling the air, tanks and all the rest of it, mmmmmmmmm i love the smell of burning nub in a crater in the morning


Register (or login) on our website and you will not see this ad.

Standard User deleted
(deleted) Tue 16-Aug-11 17:58:04
Print Post

Re: And this is why you need 64 players.


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
I'll wait on the beta me thinks.

Speeds look poor, looks to be a BC2:V fest, sounds good though.
Standard User deleted
(deleted) Tue 16-Aug-11 18:14:39
Print Post

Re: And this is why you need 64 players.


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
Hello Battlefield
Standard User deleted
(deleted) Tue 16-Aug-11 21:56:03
Print Post

Re: And this is why you need 64 players.


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by ccxo:
Hello Battlefield

Goodbye COD laugh
Standard User time2die
(knowledge is power) Tue 16-Aug-11 23:40:05
Print Post

Re: And this is why you need 64 players.


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
Looks a little boring to me wink might bridge the gap until a decent FPS like MW3 comes out 2 weeks later........................Lol

Modern Warfare rules.............................Yippee !!!

Keep it Real people........................MW v Swanny smile

A war game with not a one ounce of Blood..............Go figure...........Is it Toy soldiers in disguise crazy

Hey Swanny i know your gamer tag so you better not be playing MW3 because if you are you are going to get some serious stick on these forums for all the MW hate campaign you are running............wink

Edited by time2die (Tue 16-Aug-11 23:45:05)

Standard User deleted
(deleted) Wed 17-Aug-11 06:12:13
Print Post

Re: And this is why you need 64 players.


[re: time2die] [link to this post]
 
Sarcasm right? laugh
Standard User mrnelster
(experienced) Wed 17-Aug-11 08:25:56
Print Post

Re: And this is why you need 64 players.


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by Gzero:
I'll wait on the beta me thinks.

Speeds look poor, looks to be a BC2:V fest, sounds good though.

Me too. Looks great but they don't show the the big lulls in the battle when you have to get back to the front line. Especially when you can't get a vehicle! And especially when running felt so cumbersome.

I am basing that on BFBC mind.
.

Knowing how it works is completely different to understanding how it works.

Live BQM

FTTC - Aquiss Business 45
37.7Mbps Downstream
8.45Mbps Upstream
7ms Ping
Standard User mrnelster
(experienced) Wed 17-Aug-11 08:27:05
Print Post

Re: And this is why you need 64 players.


[re: time2die] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by time2die:
Looks a little boring to me wink might bridge the gap until a decent FPS like MW3 comes out 2 weeks later........................Lol

Modern Warfare rules.............................Yippee !!!

Keep it Real people........................MW v Swanny smile

A war game with not a one ounce of Blood..............Go figure...........Is it Toy soldiers in disguise crazy

Hey Swanny i know your gamer tag so you better not be playing MW3 because if you are you are going to get some serious stick on these forums for all the MW hate campaign you are running............wink

Lol! grin
.

Knowing how it works is completely different to understanding how it works.

Live BQM

FTTC - Aquiss Business 45
37.7Mbps Downstream
8.45Mbps Upstream
7ms Ping
Standard User time2die
(knowledge is power) Wed 17-Aug-11 08:36:48
Print Post

Re: And this is why you need 64 players.


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
Sort of private joke wink i will be getting both games as they both offer what seems to be a different style of game play................Battlefield is slow like walking through treacle and MW3 is Speedy gonzales on Crack smile
Standard User deleted
(deleted) Wed 17-Aug-11 08:54:48
Print Post

Re: And this is why you need 64 players.


[re: time2die] [link to this post]
 
No worries matey I'll be too busy with BF3 to get around to playing mw laugh
Standard User deleted
(deleted) Wed 17-Aug-11 08:56:23
Print Post

Re: And this is why you need 64 players.


[re: mrnelster] [link to this post]
 
I hope the jets and helis are easy to take down from the ground.
At the moment the helis in BFBC2 are too hard to knock down especially if you get some level 50 geek flying one.
Standard User deleted
(deleted) Wed 17-Aug-11 13:16:40
Print Post

Re: And this is why you need 64 players.


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
On PC that isn't the case. At least when I'm playing, I send enough rpgs at that heli to scare it off.
Standard User deleted
(deleted) Wed 17-Aug-11 15:12:44
Print Post

Re: And this is why you need 64 players.


[re: time2die] [link to this post]
 
Wow, really? MW is one of the slowest DM FPSs I've played. Each to there own I guess. laugh

Edited by deleted (Wed 17-Aug-11 15:14:20)

Standard User time2die
(knowledge is power) Wed 17-Aug-11 17:53:26
Print Post

Re: And this is why you need 64 players.


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
Its a lot quicker and faster than Battlefields mate which is kind of sluggish with movement and has a laggy Killzone feel to the previous Battlefield games i have played....................I'm hoping both sets of fans will be happy when they finally get released and match the videos.........
Standard User deleted
(deleted) Wed 17-Aug-11 18:35:05
Print Post

Re: And this is why you need 64 players.


[re: time2die] [link to this post]
 
Well you are talking about CoD, you either move or you dont move, camp or spray and pray wink
Standard User mrnelster
(experienced) Wed 17-Aug-11 18:36:26
Print Post

Re: And this is why you need 64 players.


[re: time2die] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by time2die:
Its a lot quicker and faster than Battlefields mate which is kind of sluggish with movement and has a laggy Killzone feel to the previous Battlefield games i have played....................I'm hoping both sets of fans will be happy when they finally get released and match the videos.........

I agree mate. It is the 'heavy' movement I didn't like in Killzone 3 and BFBC.

Love it or hate it, the movement is one of COD's strongest points.
.

Knowing how it works is completely different to understanding how it works.

Live BQM

FTTC - Aquiss Business 45
37.7Mbps Downstream
8.45Mbps Upstream
7ms Ping
Standard User deleted
(deleted) Wed 17-Aug-11 19:18:15
Print Post

Re: And this is why you need 64 players.


[re: time2die] [link to this post]
 
Movement in BF3 isn't as heavy and you aren't as "big" as BC2, i wasn't a fan of it there either tbh, same with crysis, making small movements were impossible.
Standard User time2die
(knowledge is power) Thu 18-Aug-11 00:33:14
Print Post

Re: And this is why you need 64 players.


[re: mrnelster] [link to this post]
 
Its fast and frantic and that suits my style of play mate,call it spray and pray or whatever as long as it fun and not ruined by over powered killstreaks and hackers i dont care less if it ends up been called MW 2.5 with a respray of paint.wink
Standard User deleted
(deleted) Thu 18-Aug-11 04:52:13
Print Post

Re: And this is why you need 64 players.


[re: time2die] [link to this post]
 
Isn't that contradictory? wink
Standard User deleted
(deleted) Thu 18-Aug-11 05:52:03
Print Post

Re: And this is why you need 64 players.


[re: time2die] [link to this post]
 
Well, if you call that fast you should try Warsow on PC. Don't worry, it's free and runs on anything. laugh

Really, MW is very slow for deathmatch. It has to be to work with controllers. BF isn't strictly a deathmatch game so can get away with being slower. Seems silly that they've tried to shoehorn it in.
Standard User deleted
(deleted) Thu 18-Aug-11 06:43:30
Print Post

Re: And this is why you need 64 players.


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
True this, CoD doesnt hold a light to quake in terms of speed
Standard User time2die
(knowledge is power) Thu 18-Aug-11 08:23:45
Print Post

Re: And this is why you need 64 players.


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
Quake was very fast i grant you but there was not a lot going on in that game was there........wink

The movement in MW is fast compared to most shooters and feels really smooth compared to previous Battlefield games and many others.
Standard User deleted
(deleted) Thu 18-Aug-11 18:56:10
Print Post

Re: And this is why you need 64 players.


[re: time2die] [link to this post]
 
Plenty going on with Quake, its about knowing your weapons and knowing the map and staying in control, unlike run spray die respawn run spray die run spray call in some cheap overpowered kill streak reward die respawn etc
Standard User mrnelster
(experienced) Thu 18-Aug-11 19:37:55
Print Post

BF3 Commander on PC......


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
http://m.n4g.com/news/826703
.

Knowing how it works is completely different to understanding how it works.

Live BQM

FTTC - Aquiss Business 45
37.7Mbps Downstream
8.45Mbps Upstream
7ms Ping
Standard User mrnelster
(experienced) Fri 19-Aug-11 06:26:31
Print Post

Re: BF3 Commander on PC......


[re: mrnelster] [link to this post]
 
http://www.gameblurb.net/news/activision-ceo-respond...
.

Knowing how it works is completely different to understanding how it works.

Live BQM

FTTC - Aquiss Business 45
37.7Mbps Downstream
8.45Mbps Upstream
7ms Ping
Standard User deleted
(deleted) Fri 19-Aug-11 07:00:39
Print Post

Re: BF3 Commander on PC......


[re: mrnelster] [link to this post]
 
I love the sound of hypocrisy in the morning wink
Standard User mrnelster
(experienced) Fri 19-Aug-11 17:52:05
Print Post

Re: BF3 Commander on PC......


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by FireFalcon:
I love the sound of hypocrisy in the morning wink

I must have missed something. Have Activision been slagging off BF3?
.

Knowing how it works is completely different to understanding how it works.

Live BQM

FTTC - Aquiss Business 45
37.7Mbps Downstream
8.45Mbps Upstream
7ms Ping
Standard User time2die
(knowledge is power) Fri 19-Aug-11 18:21:07
Print Post

Re: BF3 Commander on PC......


[re: mrnelster] [link to this post]
 
Just me and you playing Modern Warfare 3 mate by the sound of it wink

Personally i would by MW3 just for survival mode alone nerver mind the single player and Multiplayer that should keep me quiet for quite a few months............
Standard User mrnelster
(experienced) Fri 19-Aug-11 18:58:49
Print Post

Re: BF3 Commander on PC......


[re: time2die] [link to this post]
 
I can live with that. I will get BF3, but I know I will love the game, but in spite of the movement.

For longevity it will be survival mode for me aswell. grin

And I'm still looking forward to R3. I know you aren't a big fan but I think it is looking good. No one shot kills, no health regeneration and some really improved visuals. Add in the full campaign co-op and I'm a happy bunny. cool
.

Knowing how it works is completely different to understanding how it works.

Live BQM

FTTC - Aquiss Business 45
37.7Mbps Downstream
8.45Mbps Upstream
7ms Ping
Standard User time2die
(knowledge is power) Fri 19-Aug-11 20:20:50
Print Post

Re: BF3 Commander on PC......


[re: mrnelster] [link to this post]
 
I will be getting it mate as it does look good and i am a FPS fan,its released the same day as Dead Island so if that game lives up to my expectations [and not many games do] then Resisitance will have to take a back seat for a while.

Will catch you online with Resistance though if you like,i have changed many of my pre/orders from Playstation to Xbox as i do think they are supported a lot better online and Black Ops for me is proof in the pudding................

Saying that and this is rare.............There are many worried that as of now there has been now sign of any Battlefield footage on 360 and this is not normally the case as its always seen first on 360 with no sign of the Playstation version..wink.

Been a bad few months with nothing to buy and like i said in a previous post i am tempted to try Deus Ex Human Revolution next week so i can buy a game,would have been Body Count but the demo for me sucked.............BIGTIME
Standard User mrnelster
(experienced) Fri 19-Aug-11 22:41:16
Print Post

Re: BF3 Commander on PC......


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by FireFalcon:
I love the sound of hypocrisy in the morning wink

Talking about hypocrisy!!!

The comments are indicative of an extraordinary volte-face at Valve � a studio that in the past had been unrelenting in its criticisms to coding on PS3.
Newell said it is �absolutely important� that games like Portal 2 and Dust 514 are a success on PS3.
�We need to reward Sony for making this decision. We need to prove Sony is right.�


http://www.develop-online.net/news/38486/Valve-We-ne...
.

Knowing how it works is completely different to understanding how it works.

Live BQM

FTTC - Aquiss Business 45
37.7Mbps Downstream
8.45Mbps Upstream
7ms Ping
Pages in this thread: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | >> (show all)   Print Thread

Jump to