General Discussion
  >> General Broadband Chatter


Register (or login) on our website and you will not see this ad.


Pages in this thread: 1 | [2] | (show all)   Print Thread
Standard User jpm
(experienced) Mon 30-Jan-23 10:45:11
Print Post

Re: CGNAT?


[re: jchamier] [link to this post]
 
I could quite happily get by with a v6 allocation and then CGNAT IPv4, or some other IPv4aaS solution (as long as it didn't end up requiring me to use an ISP-provided router). I don't think CGNAT-only IPv4 services should be allowed to be advertised as internet connections, it's glorified coffee shop Wi-Fi at that point.

Edited by jpm (Mon 30-Jan-23 11:40:51)

Standard User Oliver341
(eat-sleep-adslguide) Mon 30-Jan-23 14:21:22
Print Post

Re: CGNAT?


[re: candlerb] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by candlerb:
Why not? I guess because they're worried that their systems for tracking, advertising and monetising users might not be compatible.

IPv4 CGNAT doesn't help their efforts to track users either since multiple users share one IP address.

Oliver.
Standard User Pheasant
(knowledge is power) Mon 30-Jan-23 14:44:45
Print Post

Re: CGNAT?


[re: jpm] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by jpm:
I don't think CGNAT-only IPv4 services should be allowed to be advertised as internet connections, it's glorified coffee shop Wi-Fi at that point.

Oooh harsh....but probably fair. Takes out a fair slice of the marketplace though.

Roll up, roll up; get your steaming hot pile of coffee shop WiFi... 😅


Register (or login) on our website and you will not see this ad.

Standard User jpm
(experienced) Mon 30-Jan-23 14:54:39
Print Post

Re: CGNAT?


[re: Pheasant] [link to this post]
 
I'm sure this is the point when I look around and find that none of the big providers are actually selling Internet access, they all just call it fibre or broadband which have no legal definition.
Standard User pluralist
(knowledge is power) Mon 30-Jan-23 15:37:41
Print Post

Re: CGNAT?


[re: Pheasant] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by Pheasant:
In reply to a post by jpm:
I don't think CGNAT-only IPv4 services should be allowed to be advertised as internet connections, it's glorified coffee shop Wi-Fi at that point.

Oooh harsh....but probably fair. Takes out a fair slice of the marketplace though.

Roll up, roll up; get your steaming hot pile of coffee shop WiFi... 😅
Which costs more?

A cup (or more) of coffee-shop coffee a day or a monthly broadband subscription?

No prizes for the most probable answers. laugh

Connections: OnePlus 8 Pro on Three 4+ (LTE)/5G and at home Three Mobile, with (Three)ZTE MF286D router giving about 113/20Mbps.

The best of all possible countries.

Edited by pluralist (Mon 30-Jan-23 18:05:37)

Standard User Pheasant
(knowledge is power) Mon 30-Jan-23 15:48:14
Print Post

Re: CGNAT?


[re: pluralist] [link to this post]
 
https://www.pret.co.uk/en-GB/pretcoffeesub

🤣 not much in it, sub for sub..
Standard User jchamier
(eat-sleep-adslguide) Mon 30-Jan-23 17:59:47
Print Post

Re: CGNAT?


[re: pluralist] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by pluralist:
A cup (or more) of coffee-shop coffee a day or a monthly broadband subscription?
There are some independent coffee shops left that can do you a decent cup for around £1.50, unlike the super large chains. I also think it very much depends on where you are in the country. Unlike most broadband packages.

23 years of broadband connectivity since 1999 trial - Live BQM
Pages in this thread: 1 | [2] | (show all)   Print Thread

Jump to