Technical Discussion
  >> Apple Issues


Register (or login) on our website and you will not see this ad.


Pages in this thread: 1 | 2 | [3] | (show all)   Print Thread
Moderator billford
(moderator) Sun 26-Jun-11 17:24:11
Print Post

Re: 10.6.8


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
We have to find something to complain about tongue

~~~~~~~~~~~~
Bill

[email protected] _______________Planes and Cars and ..._______________BQM & Speed

Edited by billford (Sun 26-Jun-11 17:24:34)

The author of the above post is a thinkbroadband moderator but it does not constitute an official statement on behalf of thinkbroadband.
Standard User deleted
(deleted) Sun 26-Jun-11 17:25:06
Print Post

Re: 10.6.8


[re: billford] [link to this post]
 
touch�
Standard User deleted
(deleted) Sun 26-Jun-11 17:36:52
Print Post

Re: 10.6.8


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
There was a hiccup on one of the previous updates if you were using encrypted discs.


Register (or login) on our website and you will not see this ad.

Standard User DRW
(committed) Mon 27-Jun-11 09:55:40
Print Post

Re: 10.6.8


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
A couple of years or so ago several people had inconsistent behaviour with PhotoShop on the Mac after running a software update to the then current version of OSX, rumour had it that that some modules had not updated, these then became a prereq for a subsequent update.

Running a Combo update would resolve the PS problem

Even before that occurrence I tended to run combo updates (ie on greater that 90% of occasions )

Ir was from one of the many Mac related forums that I read did I see strong recommendations to use Combo update. Initially when I first migrated to OSX I thought Software Update was the best thing since sliced bread however I have changed my mind as it is too easy to be building a potentially faulty system as a result of a bad incremental update.
Standard User deleted
(deleted) Mon 27-Jun-11 12:02:48
Print Post

Re: 10.6.8


[re: DRW] [link to this post]
 
I use Software Update, and haven't had any issues with an update for a long time, but this one threw me a curved ball. I noticed that my Dock CPU utilisation was 90%-ish - that's a whole core out of my four. This was impacting the CPU available for Folding@Home, plus it affected system responses generally. I tried shutting down apps, rebooting and so on, then checked out the interwebs and found this:

http://reviews.cnet.com/8301-13727_7-20074173-263/do...

I applied the work-round in the above link (turned off WIndows app icons in the dock) and the problem went away. Even when Parallels wasn't running, it seems it had a daemon polling for Windows application icons to show in the dock.

I doubt if my use of Software Update had any effect, as this looks like a Parallels issue.
Standard User deleted
(deleted) Mon 27-Jun-11 12:43:48
Print Post

Re: 10.6.8


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
MacBook Pro i7 processor top spec...

Just saying tongue Pic
Standard User ian_c
(eat-sleep-adslguide) Mon 27-Jun-11 14:07:29
Print Post

Re: 10.6.8


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
From the comments on your link:

This is NOT a problem with 10.6.8.

In the Parallels user forum, people reported this issue even BEFORE 10.6.8 was released. The problem happens after upgrading Parallels to build 12090.

http://forum.parallels.com/showthread.php?t=111073


Reminds of the Leopard upgrade blue screen - which turned out to be third parties (including Logitech!) using haxies in flat violation of long-standing Apple guidelines. Yet who took the flak?

Pages in this thread: 1 | 2 | [3] | (show all)   Print Thread

Jump to