Three 5G Masts in Telford

I was wondering why it taking so long not to boardcast it yet as Masts in Sutton Hill, Halesfield, Park Inn, Dawley, Randlay and Aqueduct remain inactive. There is two masts to be waiting installing in Wellington by Princess Royal Hosptal in March.

Are Three wait for final push switch on?

Edited by adslmax (Fri 19-Jan-24 19:24:08)

Max your sig is a bit non working

Working now

Website Blocked: gfast.wuaze.com
v2.6.18 | Riskware: 2.0.202401192050

Malwarebytes Browser Guard blocked this page because it may contain malicious activity.
Warning icon
We strongly recommend you do not continue. You may be putting your safety at risk by visiting this site. For more information, visit Malwarebytes Support.

Warning icon
Go back
Continue to this website
Do not block this site again.

I did notice it is http not https.

Edited by pluralist (Sat 20-Jan-24 00:09:12)

Nonsense! The site isn't malware!

Butting in, my DNS, Quad9, flagged it as possible malware also.

Not saying that it is or it isn't, but it seems to have got on a list for some reason.

I have removed it off now

In reply to a post by adslmax:

Are Three wait for final push switch on?

Installing a streetworks pole in the ground is only one of many steps. There may be a 6 month delay for power, or for the 10Gigabit connection back to the network core. (This is not related to the PON fibre technology used for domestic broadband and discussed elsewhere on this site).

Planning sites at local councils can tell you when physical works take place (installing the pole) but there is no way to find out why a streetworks site is not active yet.

Interesting you have so many, here there are 3 proposed, with planning permission, that have not been installed.

Maybe Three are waiting to find out if the will be allowed to merge with Vodafone.

https://vodafoneandthree.uk/

In reply to a post by jchamier:

In reply to a post by adslmax:

Are Three wait for final push switch on?

Installing a streetworks pole in the ground is only one of many steps. There may be a 6 month delay for power, or for the 10Gigabit connection back to the network core. (This is not related to the PON fibre technology used for domestic broadband and discussed elsewhere on this site).

security being the only reason[kinda mostly].

In reply to a post by jchamier:

Planning sites at local councils can tell you when physical works take place (installing the pole) but there is no way to find out why a streetworks site is not active yet.

bit like fibre networks - you see the cbt or the giant (or not so giant) spool of fibre, but you don't see the exchange work or miss the splitter being dropped into the ground etc.

In reply to a post by jchamier:

Interesting you have so many, here there are 3 proposed, with planning permission, that have not been installed.

could be done for any rejection of the others.

In reply to a post by jchamier:

Maybe Three are waiting to find out if the will be allowed to merge with Vodafone.

https://vodafoneandthree.uk/

please don't give me nightmares 😂🙈💩

In reply to a post by pluralist:

Website Blocked: gfast.wuaze.com
v2.6.18 | Riskware: 2.0.202401192050

Malwarebytes Browser Guard blocked this page because it may contain malicious activity.
Warning icon
We strongly recommend you do not continue. You may be putting your safety at risk by visiting this site. For more information, visit Malwarebytes Support.

Warning icon
Go back
Continue to this website
Do not block this site again.

I did notice it is http not https.

Up and running now all working now https://sogfast.42web.io/index.htm

It's still rejected by MalwareBytes.

I have contact my server company they told me to take no notice what MalwareBytes detect. The dslstats are secured safe.

The TLD is "British Indian Ocean Territory". I'll stick with what MalwareBytes says.

Also see this.

Edited by pluralist (Wed 24-Jan-24 23:59:03)

Scam Detector ?!

That is much worse than the TLD of .io that you thought was an issue. I would ignore that site entirely.

Many countries sell access to their TLD such as Tuvalu (.tv) and Italy (.it) for use with profitable English speaking websites.

Cheap web hosting always uses obscure domain names as they are cheap!!

In reply to a post by pluralist:

The TLD is "British Indian Ocean Territory". I'll stick with what MalwareBytes says.

Also see this.

Thanks I have deleted everything off

It's still in your sig.

It came up as an early option to a search for comments about 42web . io

It did seem a bit weird in the way it went about making its point. Thanks for the advice. There were others that looked to be also critical about the one in question.

I forgot, and you may not notice an edit.

What do you reckon to the site in his sig and the one(s) in the posts? I wonder who his ISP is and what site told him things were fine.

In reply to a post by pluralist:

It came up as an early option to a search for comments about 42web . io

It did seem a bit weird in the way it went about making its point. Thanks for the advice. There were others that looked to be also critical about the one in question.

I believe there are more scam psuedo security sites than real sites. Free web hosting is not great but isn't automatically a scam.

In reply to a post by pluralist:

What do you reckon to the site in his sig and the one(s) in the posts? I wonder who his ISP is and what site told him things were fine.

Site? as posted previously. ISP is not connected. Whom told him? I assume the free web host.

Web Hosting Talk is good forum to discuss web hosting!

I would posit that the content provided by Max was probably fine. However, given the type of hosting it is quite likely that a number of people use it to host bad content. Parts of the site are probably absolutely no problem but other parts most likely have things that have been detected as malicious. Malwarebytes will mark the whole site because parts of it are bad content - not uncommon.

In reply to a post by ian72:

Malwarebytes will mark the whole site because parts of it are bad content - not uncommon.

Agreed, those whom remember Geocities will recall the horrendous pop up adverts the site added to your content ... to pay for it. These ads ended up being the end of the site, as the owners did not screen them for malware. Over a decade ago.