The 3G performance was better than O2, with far less latency and almost double the data rate. I gather EE are discontinuing 3G next month so I wouldn't be surprised if hardly anyone was using it.
Only in
Warrington, if you live there. Rest of country likely won't lose 3G until 2024, however its not worth using as the 3G has been reduced to the minimum.
The 4G performance, compared to the O2 and Three graphs in the first post, is excellent. Not much latency, not too many latency 'spikes', virtually no packet loss, and reasonable speeds. I am able to attain 15-25Mbps down and 5-10Mbps up which is more than fast enough for my need.
Pretty common, you're likely found that EE deploys 20 MHz on 1800 (Band 3) and in many areas has deployed 20+20 or 20+15 across two carriers. Then EE is also often deploying 2100 (Band 1) and 2600 (Band 7) for capacity.
Of course if you have a Cat 4 modem then you can only use one carrier at a time, on any of the bands. So it is most likely you will be comparing O2's 10 MHz on Band 20, and Three's 15 MHz on Band 3 with EE's 20 MHz on Band 3.
Band 3 gave the best performance so I've locked the router to that.
Locking confuses me, as this means the mast can't ask your UE to move to a different band if the statistics make it worthwhile, e.g. from Band 3 to Band 1 to Band 7 etc.
23 years of broadband connectivity since 1999 trial - Live BQM
Edited by jchamier (Fri 26-May-23 10:15:05)