User comments on ISPs
  >> Other Providers (without dedicated forums)


Register (or login) on our website and you will not see this ad.


These posts have been archived and can no longer be replied to or modified.
Pages in this thread: 1 | [2] | (show all)   Print Thread
ISP Representative merula
(isp) Mon 05-Apr-10 23:53:25
Print Post

Re: FTTC conundrum


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
It's not untrue since the data comes from the BT checker.

More that while BT have stated the exchange to updates they mau not have determined which cabinets are being upgraded... or even maybe the given cabinet isn't....

I know the wording is slightly wrong - it should say your line not your exchange and I will tweak that
The above post has been made by an ISP REPRESENTATIVE (although not necessarily the ISP being discussed in the post).
Standard User deleted
(deleted) Fri 09-Apr-10 00:53:57
Print Post

Re: FTTC conundrum


[re: merula] [link to this post]
 
It's not untrue since the data comes from the BT checker.

And that is NEVER wrong wink?

Regards

DrT

Edited by deleted (Fri 09-Apr-10 00:54:26)

Standard User ggremlin
(regular) Wed 14-Apr-10 19:32:05
Print Post

Re: FTTC lnbar


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
them openreach pixes are about,
there are 5 applications for cabinets in (high) barnets conservation areas,
one in hadley has just had its goundworks done. (before planning permission...) Barnet planning ref b/01244/10, no plans online yet though.

site notices should be up tomorrow.


Register (or login) on our website and you will not see this ad.

Standard User deleted
(deleted) Wed 14-Apr-10 21:15:57
Print Post

Re: FTTC lnbar


[re: ggremlin] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by ggremlin:
them openreach pixes are about,
there are 5 applications for cabinets in (high) barnets conservation areas,
one in hadley has just had its goundworks done. (before planning permission...) Barnet planning ref b/01244/10, no plans online yet though.

site notices should be up tomorrow.


Thanks for the good news.

It's a crying shame that progress has to be slowed or even stopped by needing planning permission for the cabinets. That's the one thing I admire about France...if something is needed it is done without our years of public consultation and labyrinthine planning system.

Regards

DrT
Standard User ggremlin
(regular) Wed 14-Apr-10 21:26:44
Print Post

Re: FTTC lnbar


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
planning permission is only required for those in the conservation areas, I dont think that has slowed progress, indeed as I said before, the groundwork for a box in Hadley has been installed, even before the planning application notices have gone up...

the other boxes they can just place where they like ( under 'code powers' )
Pages in this thread: 1 | [2] | (show all)   Print Thread

Jump to