The failure to re-introduce a link for the benefit of customers still within its terms though seems as deliberate as failing to tell customers upgrading from a legacy package to a new one that the 18 month contract can be (why not IS) reduced to 12 months if you raise a ticket (that shouldn't be necessary).
I think that this is the fundamental point at the core of this issue.
Why an "opt in" for both a 90 day guarantee and a reduction to a 12 month contract
when I see no reason, unless I've missed something, for
not wanting this option.
There is no doubt both these issues have caused confusion and aggravation to both customers and front line staff. A system to automatically opt you in unless some juicy carrot was provided to
not want what seems a desirable cost free option would have saved all this confusion.
My guess is that the 90 day guarantee was marketing led without being thought thought and a proper system in place to monitor it, same a the changing products issue, that arrangement seems very ad hoc. Mess up rather than conspiracy in my view...but that does not make the ISP any less culpable as both these customer benefits should be bestowed automatically IMO.
If it
was the intention of management to hope people would not take up these options,...... then I reckon they have shot themselves in the foot.