I only said before that you were "a little unfair" - as in I agree with what you say but do feel it is not quite as black and white as you make it.
A week without Internet can be difficult for some (and last time I did it I did get a mobile router to enable me to stay online, does cost a bit though).
And as far as free - you "could" say that the fact I would still be paying for the Internet for the week I would be waiting for a router means that I would be paying for no service - so could say that is a cost to waiting for the modem.
What Sky could do is to allow people to use their own routers but insist the Sky router is used for all support work. But there are other benefits for Sky from having a known router base.
Personally, I use the Sky router. I had a couple of days at the start waiting for the router to arrive (PS if you leave sky do NOT throw away or sell the router if you may ever go back again as they will expect you to use the router they have already provided).
But, even though I use their router it would be good to have my own to give me more control over the connection. I would almost prefer it if they gave you an ethernet modem and allowed you to plug your own router into that (that way they control the important connection part but you control what happens after that).
I may well do something similar later using a 2nd router but it would be another thing drawing power and at the moment the convenience of control is outweighs the inconvenience of more devices.
Edited by ian72 (Mon 09-May-11 14:14:10)