Technical Discussion
  >> Windows Issues


Register (or login) on our website and you will not see this ad.


Pages in this thread: 1 | 2 | [3] | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | (show all)   Print Thread
Standard User deleted
(deleted) Tue 16-Aug-11 11:08:30
Print Post

Re: Firefox 6


[re: Chrysalis] [link to this post]
 
It's just a numbers race, really. Firefox seem to be the worst offender, which is quite surprising to me.
Standard User Chrysalis
(eat-sleep-adslguide) Tue 16-Aug-11 11:09:04
Print Post

Re: Firefox 6


[re: zyborg47] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by zyborg47:
In reply to a post by Chrysalis:
bartab fixes the delay, fixes the stalls (by forcing idle tabs to unload).
crashes I found using the plugin container options help, I have flash load in the container which also stops flash videos from stuttering as well.
I think a lot of firefox problems stem from the fact they still having everything share 1 process, by default the entire firefox gui, garbage colelction, tabs, browsing etc. all runs under 1 process. Both chrome and IE stopped doing this ages ago.

I can understand why people have given FF the boot as a lot of its issues are long standing that get ignored by the dev's.


Should not have to use a add on for poor coding.


agreed and it is actually still buggy the addon, not fixed as I thought with the workaround although browser is useable it is a bit of a joke the situation. Firefox to me without bartab the way I use the browser is unuseable as it would consume many gigs of ram and be stuttering on everything.
Standard User deleted
(deleted) Tue 16-Aug-11 11:11:14
Print Post

Re: Firefox 6


[re: Chrysalis] [link to this post]
 
The difference here is that FreeBSD is real software, not a toy. People want performance, stability, and reliability from FreeBSD. They don't care what the button to change the font colour looks like.


Register (or login) on our website and you will not see this ad.

Standard User Chrysalis
(eat-sleep-adslguide) Tue 16-Aug-11 11:20:03
Print Post

Re: Firefox 6


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
you may see firefox as a toy but i dont.

browsers are used a lot these days, especially with the emergence of web apps as well.

clearly opinion is split but surprisingly I am even seeing web developers now shouting out against the policy, the 2 main reasons given are.

1 - firefox will have fragmented userbase split across many versions which display web pages differently as updated every 8 weeks. So harder to support firefox than say IE.
2 - a consistent browser behaviour is more important that strict complaince to standards, ie. better to have a browser that wont be changing how it reads code every 2 months even tho it may not be as compliant.

Edited by Chrysalis (Tue 16-Aug-11 11:20:30)

Standard User Chrysalis
(eat-sleep-adslguide) Tue 16-Aug-11 19:00:05
Print Post

Re: Firefox 6


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
just spent 10 mins wondering why tesco order wouldnt submit, in firefox5. Tried in ff 3.6 and worked first time hmmmm.

yes I am not on 6, as it took me 2 months to test 5, havent had time to test 6 yet.
Standard User deleted
(deleted) Tue 16-Aug-11 19:23:59
Print Post

Re: Firefox 6


[re: Chrysalis] [link to this post]
 
I use a number of sites where the popup for the credit card extra check only works in Internet Explorer

Edited by deleted (Tue 16-Aug-11 19:24:14)

Standard User zyborg47
(eat-sleep-adslguide) Wed 17-Aug-11 01:00:38
Print Post

Re: Firefox 6


[re: micksharpe] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by micksharpe:
Maybe they want to catch up with IE version numbers, in which case they have a long way to go.


i think they are more worried about Chrome than IE.

Adrian

Desktop machine now powered by windows 7 pro 64bit , laptop by ubuntu

On ADSL24 using C&W network.
Standard User zyborg47
(eat-sleep-adslguide) Wed 17-Aug-11 01:02:00
Print Post

Re: Firefox 6


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by Sark:
what improvements do these Firefox updates really bring that could not be put into say 4.6 instead of going to version 5
What difference does it make whether they call it v4.6 or v5.0?


every time they do what they call a main update, they stop even more add ons working. when they just done 3.5 to 3.6 the add ons was not affected.

Adrian

Desktop machine now powered by windows 7 pro 64bit , laptop by ubuntu

On ADSL24 using C&W network.
Standard User Brunel
(experienced) Thu 18-Aug-11 22:28:09
Print Post

Re: Firefox 6


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
Just been "fed" FF 7 beta.

A couple of little used add-ons not functioning.
Standard User camieabz
(sensei) Thu 18-Aug-11 22:44:10
Print Post

Re: Firefox 6


[re: Brunel] [link to this post]
 
FF have been feeding me FF6 as an update all week. Grr.

~~~~~~~~~~


© Camieabz 2002-2011

Live BQM ~ Connection Data
Pages in this thread: 1 | 2 | [3] | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | (show all)   Print Thread

Jump to