General Discussion
  >> Fibre Broadband


Register (or login) on our website and you will not see this ad.


Pages in this thread: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | [5] | 6 | (show all)   Print Thread
Standard User adslmax
(eat-sleep-adslguide) Fri 11-Jun-21 23:23:25
Print Post

Re: UnchainedISP G.fast 221/30


[re: Jack_Hackett] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by Jack_Hackett:
How do you know he has mental health issues did he tell you himself?


.


Be careful what you are saying! I am in long term disability mental health issues.

Edited by adslmax (Fri 11-Jun-21 23:26:41)

Standard User adslmax
(eat-sleep-adslguide) Fri 11-Jun-21 23:24:36
Print Post

Re: UnchainedISP G.fast 221/30


[re: adslmax] [link to this post]
 
@MrSaffron please closed this thread

Edited by adslmax (Fri 11-Jun-21 23:27:02)

Standard User broadband66
(knowledge is power) Sat 12-Jun-21 10:05:43
Print Post

Re: UnchainedISP G.fast 221/30


[re: GonePostal] [link to this post]
 
+1

"I know some people always have to have the last word and prove that they are right"

Was Eclipse Home Option 1, VM 2Mb & O2 Standard
Utility Warehouse (up to 16mbps) via Talk Talk, upgraded to fibre 40/10


Register (or login) on our website and you will not see this ad.

Standard User FibreBubble
(learned) Sat 12-Jun-21 10:21:48
Print Post

Re: UnchainedISP G.fast 221/30


[re: adslmax] [link to this post]
 
Hey Max. Enjoy the sunshine and enjoy the circuit.

If the circuit is not dropping let it look after itself without you peeping at the stats and worrying about it.

#CountMeIn
Standard User Jack_Hackett
(knowledge is power) Sat 12-Jun-21 13:06:23
Print Post

Re: UnchainedISP G.fast 221/30


[re: GonePostal] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by GonePostal:
In reply to a post by Jack_Hackett:
In reply to a post by jelv:
It is known to many of us from Max's postings both on here and the Kitz forums that Max has mental health issues.


In that case surely the best action would be to remove his permission to post in the forums like this surely allowing him to post is the opposite of what is needed to stop this behaviour.


I know some people always have to have the last word and prove that they are right but I wonder if that sort of behaviour is really appropriate when laying down the law about personal matters concerning another poster. As far as I can see, @dect and @jelv have a rather more mature take on the situation.

(Edited to acknowledge the earlier input from @dect).


Why do you assume i am trying to have the last word i have nothing to prove here.

Letting Max carry on posting about his never ending chase for the ultimate speed cannot be helpful and this is never going to stop (and you know that) if that is not the case can you explain why letting him carry on is a better option?

Edited by Jack_Hackett (Sat 12-Jun-21 13:08:11)

Standard User Jack_Hackett
(knowledge is power) Sat 12-Jun-21 13:15:15
Print Post

Re: UnchainedISP G.fast 221/30


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by dect:
In reply to a post by Jack_Hackett:
How do you know he has mental health issues did he tell you himself?
Didn't I say we should let it drop? maybe it could be you one day so have some dignity for those who do have issues.


Yes you did suggest we drop it but as i totally disagree with what you and others have accused me of i have no intention of doing so and will put the record straight.

I thought suggesting stopping a person with mental health issues from posting in two forums where people prove that the majority of what he posts is a lie and openly tell him in the forums he is doing so was showing sympathy, i guess you have a different view on what sympathy is when you suggest i have non.
(not dignity as you posted)

Edited by Jack_Hackett (Sat 12-Jun-21 13:58:06)

Standard User adslmax
(eat-sleep-adslguide) Sat 12-Jun-21 15:46:19
Print Post

Re: UnchainedISP G.fast 221/30


[re: Jack_Hackett] [link to this post]
 
My G.fast are now rock stable 221/30 as both snr also steady at 3.1dB.

https://www.thinkbroadband.com/speedtest/16235093562...

https://i.ibb.co/s16bLzr/Untitled.jpg

No issues now.

Edited by adslmax (Sat 12-Jun-21 15:50:17)

Standard User deleted
(deleted) Sat 12-Jun-21 16:17:04
Print Post

Re: UnchainedISP G.fast 221/30


[re: Jack_Hackett] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by Jack_Hackett:
Yes you did suggest we drop it but as i totally disagree with what you and others have accused me of i have no intention of doing so and will put the record straight.
Let me put the record straight, I haven't accused you of doing anything to this point (other than asking you to back off ) but I am now seeing what others are saying about you wanting the last word.

We have told you one of the posters who you seem happy to attack has a mental health issue but instead of backing off like any self respecting person would do you want to keep on posting and inflict more pain on him. I am starting to wonder why you have only just come back from 8 years away from this forum and I'm starting to think it could be you've been in prison as you seem to like a big of aggro.
Standard User Jack_Hackett
(knowledge is power) Sat 12-Jun-21 16:24:12
Print Post

Re: UnchainedISP G.fast 221/30


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by dect:
In reply to a post by Jack_Hackett:
Yes you did suggest we drop it but as i totally disagree with what you and others have accused me of i have no intention of doing so and will put the record straight.
Let me put the record straight, I haven't accused you of doing anything to this point (other than asking you to back off ) but I am now seeing what others are saying about you wanting the last word.

We have told you one of the posters who you seem happy to attack has a mental health issue but instead of backing off like any self respecting person would do you want to keep on posting and inflict more pain on him.


So rather than answer the points i made in the posts above you decide to point out again that i was asked to drop the subject i guess i shouldn't have expected anything else.

I have said nothing new in the posts to upset Max so how am i "inflicting more pain" would you care to discuss the points i made which as i said were posted to help the situation not "inflict more pain" or are you just **** stirring?

I am starting to wonder why you have only just come back from 8 years away from this forum and I'm starting to think it could be you've been in prison as you seem to like a big of aggro.



Well Sherlock you got this one totally wrong i have never been in prison and resent the accusation is that how low you have to stoop to get your point across sad lad? and although It really has got nothing to do with you but as you brought it up i will explain -

I lost my password for the account i have been using in recent years and as i couldn't get the email address that i used then to work i couldn't change the password, fortunately for me i found the old log in details for this account so decided to use this one as i will no longer be using the other.

.

Edited by Jack_Hackett (Sat 12-Jun-21 16:42:30)

Standard User deleted
(deleted) Sat 12-Jun-21 16:39:11
Print Post

Re: UnchainedISP G.fast 221/30


[re: Jack_Hackett] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by Jack_Hackett:
would you care to discuss the points i made
I am not going to get in to a full blown discussion about if that poster should or shouldn't post in this forum, management are fully aware of the situation so its with them not you or I. If you really want the last word then feel free to reply but I'm out now as I've tried to do the right thing by that poster even if you can't see that and think I'm stirring it by suggesting we all drop it.
Pages in this thread: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | [5] | 6 | (show all)   Print Thread

Jump to