User comments on ISPs
  >> IDNet


Register (or login) on our website and you will not see this ad.


These posts have been archived and can no longer be replied to or modified.
Pages in this thread: 1 | [2] | 3 | 4 | (show all)   Print Thread
Moderator billford
(moderator) Tue 06-May-08 18:01:41
Print Post

Re: IPv6


[re: adslmax] [link to this post]
 
Nope... I think a Speedtouch 546 can be hacked, but then it loses much else that makes it a nice router for the price.

Otherwise you're into this sort of price bracket if you can't find it on eBay

~~~~~~~~~~~~
Bill

[email protected]
The author of the above post is a thinkbroadband moderator but it does not constitute an official statement on behalf of thinkbroadband.
Standard User wingco1
(eat-sleep-adslguide) Tue 06-May-08 21:04:38
Print Post

Re: IPv6


[re: billford] [link to this post]
 
I'll pre-empt the next enquiry from Max, No it doesn't give faster download speeds

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

"Nearly all men can stand adversity, but if you want to test a man's character, give him power."
Abraham Lincoln
16th president of US (1809 - 1865)

http://www.speedtest.net/result/266508745.png
Moderator billford
(moderator) Tue 06-May-08 22:16:58
Print Post

Re: IPv6


[re: wingco1] [link to this post]
 


~~~~~~~~~~~~
Bill

[email protected]
The author of the above post is a thinkbroadband moderator but it does not constitute an official statement on behalf of thinkbroadband.


Register (or login) on our website and you will not see this ad.

Standard User deleted
(deleted) Tue 06-May-08 22:32:40
Print Post

Re: IPv6


[re: wingco1] [link to this post]
 
Wouldn't IPv6 have larger IP headers and therefore more overheads?
So it could in theory reduce the download speed by a small fraction of a %
Standard User deleted
(deleted) Tue 06-May-08 23:42:09
Print Post

Re: IPv6


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
No, IPv6 is "greener" protocol due to adaptation to todays needs for more data, speed and flexibility - p2p etc - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jumbogram .
Standard User deleted
(deleted) Tue 06-May-08 23:49:39
Print Post

Re: IPv6


[re: wingco1] [link to this post]
 
Having both IPv4 and IPv6 is like having hot and cold water pipes running through the same single tap. You can't get more than the tap, but somethimes hot water gives better pressure and sometimes cold. You have chance to choose and if hot water(lets say it is coming seperaty from street) stops flowing, you can still get cold water..

If you combine IPv4 and IPv6 p2p seeders, you can maximise download speed, especially when some countries have developed IPv6 only networks. Some providers filter p2p on IPv4, but not IPv6, like here - http://www.ipv6.com/articles/blog/Comcast-Verizon-Filtering-P2P-Traffic.htm

Diversification, imagine internet gets flooded on IPv4, you still maintain some access via IPv6.

Yes it might be, that if you are very standard user not using any innovative applications, you might not need to upgrade or to wonder another three years, but otherwise I would rather keep up to date, especially if you are investing in new hardware, using p2p & etc.

Standard User deleted
(deleted) Wed 07-May-08 07:10:03
Print Post

Re: IPv6


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
I was referring to RFC 2460 (IPv6) and 791 (IPv4) rather than wikipedia. And if you read the rfc 2675 they quote, you'll see that the option is not useful on an ADSL link due to the required fragmentation of your large packets into MTU-sized bits.
So it doesn't improve the link performance. It may, however, make things even worse.
Standard User deleted
(deleted) Wed 07-May-08 09:09:10
Print Post

Re: IPv6


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
You are talking about the current and I about the future. Who will use adsl in the future?
Standard User deleted
(deleted) Wed 07-May-08 20:24:40
Print Post

Re: IPv6


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
I was remaining on topic. Sorry if that offends you
Standard User Bobby_Valentino
(experienced) Thu 08-May-08 11:54:02
Print Post

Re: IPv6


[re: billford] [link to this post]
 
I hope when 802.11N has fully launched that Cisco brings out a SOHO router thats got a integrated 1gbps switch and 802.11n wireless capabilites. Oh and also a fiber port just for future proofing lol. That would be awesom, and make things even more attractive to buying Cisco for the average home user

Edited by Bobby_Valentino (Thu 08-May-08 11:54:35)

Pages in this thread: 1 | [2] | 3 | 4 | (show all)   Print Thread

Jump to